Impact of the number and sampling time of water content measurements on the identifiability of a concentration-dependent water diffusivity

•The identifiability of a concentration-dependent diffusivity was verified.•The diffusivity is locally structurally identifiable from the water content.•The diffusivity may not be practically identifiable for noise intensity>0.4%.•Sampling times of the water content should not be concentrated in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of heat and mass transfer 2016-08, Vol.99, p.548-555
Hauptverfasser: Mercier, Samuel, Marcos, Bernard, Moresoli, Christine, Mondor, Martin, Villeneuve, Sébastien
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•The identifiability of a concentration-dependent diffusivity was verified.•The diffusivity is locally structurally identifiable from the water content.•The diffusivity may not be practically identifiable for noise intensity>0.4%.•Sampling times of the water content should not be concentrated in a short period.•The asymptotic method underestimates the uncertainty of the diffusivity. The aim of this work was to determine the impact of the experimental conditions (number and sampling time) of measurements of the water content on the identifiability of a concentration-dependent water diffusivity. Water contents simulating a drying process were generated from a diffusion model with the addition of Gaussian noise. An infinite slab with Dirichlet boundary conditions was considered. The coefficients describing a concentration-dependent water diffusivity were estimated from the water content by least-squares minimization. The identifiability of the coefficients was investigated from the model sensitivity functions and using the asymptotic method, the profile likelihood method, and Monte Carlo simulation. The inner product sensitivity matrix was full rank, indicating that the coefficients were locally structurally identifiable. The coefficients were estimated more accurately from water content obtained over the whole drying process, because sampling times concentrated in a short period increased the correlation between the coefficients and increased their uncertainty. The coefficients were practically identifiable from the water content for noise intensity below 0.4%. Above that threshold, the number of measurements of the water content required for the practical identifiability of the coefficients increased linearly with the noise intensity of the water content.
ISSN:0017-9310
1879-2189
DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.03.119