Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on Qualitative Assessments of Right Ventricular Dysfunction With Echocardiography in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism

Objectives To evaluate observer agreement using qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction prognostication in submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods Two emergency physicians and 2 cardiologists independently reviewed 31 packets of goal‐directed e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2016-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2113-2120
Hauptverfasser: Weekes, Anthony J., Oh, Laura, Thacker, Gregory, Johnson, Angela K., Runyon, Michael, Rose, Geoffrey, Johnson, Thomas, Templin, Megan, Norton, H. James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2120
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2113
container_title Journal of ultrasound in medicine
container_volume 35
creator Weekes, Anthony J.
Oh, Laura
Thacker, Gregory
Johnson, Angela K.
Runyon, Michael
Rose, Geoffrey
Johnson, Thomas
Templin, Megan
Norton, H. James
description Objectives To evaluate observer agreement using qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction prognostication in submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods Two emergency physicians and 2 cardiologists independently reviewed 31 packets of goal‐directed echocardiographic video clips consisting of at least 3 windows obtained by emergency physicians from normotensive patients with PE. Nine packets were repeated to assess for intraobserver agreement. Right ventricular dysfunction criteria on goal‐directed echocardiography were as follows: RV enlargement was present, with a right‐to‐left ventricular basal diameter ratio of 1.0 or higher and blunting of the apex of the RV in 2 or more different windows; RV systolic dysfunction was present if the tricuspid annulus moved toward the apex 10 mm or less and there was RV free wall hypokinesis; and septal deviation was present with any flattening or deviation of the ventricular septum toward the left ventricle. Results Among the 4 participants, there was 83.9% agreement on the presence or absence of RV enlargement (κ = 0.84), 74.2% agreement on the presence or absence of RV systolic dysfunction (κ = 0.69), and 71.0% agreement on the presence or absence of septal deviation (κ = 0.59). Intraobserver agreement was 100% for each RV dysfunction variable for each observer (κ = 1.0). Conclusions Agreement was substantial for both severe RV enlargement and RV systolic dysfunction and moderate for septal deviation. Right ventricular dysfunction assessment with qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria is reproducible for PE risk stratification.
doi_str_mv 10.7863/ultra.15.11007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1824223187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1824223187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-f00055917f3a88ea8df3500000fa58df84b883fc067ad56c1f06b68603d9c30d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFuEzEQhi0EomngyhH5yGXDeB2vHXGKSqBFrVoQhaPl9dqJkXed2t6iPE1fFScpvdYXa8bf_GPpQ-gdgRkXDf04-hzVjLAZIQD8BZoQxqBaNIS-RBOouajm9YKfoNOU_gDUQPj8NTqpOQPKGZ-gh4shmxjaZOK9iVgNHS6dqJ46y3U0pjdDxmHA30flXVbZ3Ru8TMmktH9JOFj8w603Gf8qZXR69Criz7tkx0FnVwZ_u7zBK70JWsXOhXVU280OuwHflLBDxIG4GX0fBhV3eNW3wbvUv0GvrPLJvH28p-j2y-rn2Xl1ef314mx5WWkqOK0sADC2INxSJYRRorOUwf5YxUoh5q0Q1GpouOpYo4mFpm1EA7RbaAodnaIPx9xtDHejSVn2LmnjvRpMGJMkop7XNSVl2RTNjqiOIaVorNxG15dPSwJyL0UepEjC5EFKGXj_mD22veme8P8WCvDpCPx13uyeiZPfbq-Kx4YyAjUhlP4D--GeyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1824223187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on Qualitative Assessments of Right Ventricular Dysfunction With Echocardiography in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Weekes, Anthony J. ; Oh, Laura ; Thacker, Gregory ; Johnson, Angela K. ; Runyon, Michael ; Rose, Geoffrey ; Johnson, Thomas ; Templin, Megan ; Norton, H. James</creator><creatorcontrib>Weekes, Anthony J. ; Oh, Laura ; Thacker, Gregory ; Johnson, Angela K. ; Runyon, Michael ; Rose, Geoffrey ; Johnson, Thomas ; Templin, Megan ; Norton, H. James</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To evaluate observer agreement using qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction prognostication in submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods Two emergency physicians and 2 cardiologists independently reviewed 31 packets of goal‐directed echocardiographic video clips consisting of at least 3 windows obtained by emergency physicians from normotensive patients with PE. Nine packets were repeated to assess for intraobserver agreement. Right ventricular dysfunction criteria on goal‐directed echocardiography were as follows: RV enlargement was present, with a right‐to‐left ventricular basal diameter ratio of 1.0 or higher and blunting of the apex of the RV in 2 or more different windows; RV systolic dysfunction was present if the tricuspid annulus moved toward the apex 10 mm or less and there was RV free wall hypokinesis; and septal deviation was present with any flattening or deviation of the ventricular septum toward the left ventricle. Results Among the 4 participants, there was 83.9% agreement on the presence or absence of RV enlargement (κ = 0.84), 74.2% agreement on the presence or absence of RV systolic dysfunction (κ = 0.69), and 71.0% agreement on the presence or absence of septal deviation (κ = 0.59). Intraobserver agreement was 100% for each RV dysfunction variable for each observer (κ = 1.0). Conclusions Agreement was substantial for both severe RV enlargement and RV systolic dysfunction and moderate for septal deviation. Right ventricular dysfunction assessment with qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria is reproducible for PE risk stratification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-9613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7863/ultra.15.11007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27503757</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</publisher><subject>echocardiography ; Echocardiography - methods ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; observer agreement ; Observer Variation ; pulmonary embolism ; Pulmonary Embolism - complications ; Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging ; Pulmonary Embolism - physiopathology ; Reproducibility of Results ; right ventricular dysfunction ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - complications ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2016-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2113-2120</ispartof><rights>2016 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-f00055917f3a88ea8df3500000fa58df84b883fc067ad56c1f06b68603d9c30d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-f00055917f3a88ea8df3500000fa58df84b883fc067ad56c1f06b68603d9c30d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.7863%2Fultra.15.11007$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.7863%2Fultra.15.11007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27503757$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weekes, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thacker, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Angela K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runyon, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Templin, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, H. James</creatorcontrib><title>Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on Qualitative Assessments of Right Ventricular Dysfunction With Echocardiography in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism</title><title>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</title><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><description>Objectives To evaluate observer agreement using qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction prognostication in submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods Two emergency physicians and 2 cardiologists independently reviewed 31 packets of goal‐directed echocardiographic video clips consisting of at least 3 windows obtained by emergency physicians from normotensive patients with PE. Nine packets were repeated to assess for intraobserver agreement. Right ventricular dysfunction criteria on goal‐directed echocardiography were as follows: RV enlargement was present, with a right‐to‐left ventricular basal diameter ratio of 1.0 or higher and blunting of the apex of the RV in 2 or more different windows; RV systolic dysfunction was present if the tricuspid annulus moved toward the apex 10 mm or less and there was RV free wall hypokinesis; and septal deviation was present with any flattening or deviation of the ventricular septum toward the left ventricle. Results Among the 4 participants, there was 83.9% agreement on the presence or absence of RV enlargement (κ = 0.84), 74.2% agreement on the presence or absence of RV systolic dysfunction (κ = 0.69), and 71.0% agreement on the presence or absence of septal deviation (κ = 0.59). Intraobserver agreement was 100% for each RV dysfunction variable for each observer (κ = 1.0). Conclusions Agreement was substantial for both severe RV enlargement and RV systolic dysfunction and moderate for septal deviation. Right ventricular dysfunction assessment with qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria is reproducible for PE risk stratification.</description><subject>echocardiography</subject><subject>Echocardiography - methods</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>observer agreement</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>pulmonary embolism</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - complications</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - physiopathology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>right ventricular dysfunction</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - complications</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology</subject><issn>0278-4297</issn><issn>1550-9613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFuEzEQhi0EomngyhH5yGXDeB2vHXGKSqBFrVoQhaPl9dqJkXed2t6iPE1fFScpvdYXa8bf_GPpQ-gdgRkXDf04-hzVjLAZIQD8BZoQxqBaNIS-RBOouajm9YKfoNOU_gDUQPj8NTqpOQPKGZ-gh4shmxjaZOK9iVgNHS6dqJ46y3U0pjdDxmHA30flXVbZ3Ru8TMmktH9JOFj8w603Gf8qZXR69Criz7tkx0FnVwZ_u7zBK70JWsXOhXVU280OuwHflLBDxIG4GX0fBhV3eNW3wbvUv0GvrPLJvH28p-j2y-rn2Xl1ef314mx5WWkqOK0sADC2INxSJYRRorOUwf5YxUoh5q0Q1GpouOpYo4mFpm1EA7RbaAodnaIPx9xtDHejSVn2LmnjvRpMGJMkop7XNSVl2RTNjqiOIaVorNxG15dPSwJyL0UepEjC5EFKGXj_mD22veme8P8WCvDpCPx13uyeiZPfbq-Kx4YyAjUhlP4D--GeyA</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Weekes, Anthony J.</creator><creator>Oh, Laura</creator><creator>Thacker, Gregory</creator><creator>Johnson, Angela K.</creator><creator>Runyon, Michael</creator><creator>Rose, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Johnson, Thomas</creator><creator>Templin, Megan</creator><creator>Norton, H. James</creator><general>American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on Qualitative Assessments of Right Ventricular Dysfunction With Echocardiography in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism</title><author>Weekes, Anthony J. ; Oh, Laura ; Thacker, Gregory ; Johnson, Angela K. ; Runyon, Michael ; Rose, Geoffrey ; Johnson, Thomas ; Templin, Megan ; Norton, H. James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-f00055917f3a88ea8df3500000fa58df84b883fc067ad56c1f06b68603d9c30d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>echocardiography</topic><topic>Echocardiography - methods</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>observer agreement</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>pulmonary embolism</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - complications</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - physiopathology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>right ventricular dysfunction</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - complications</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weekes, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thacker, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Angela K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runyon, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Templin, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, H. James</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weekes, Anthony J.</au><au>Oh, Laura</au><au>Thacker, Gregory</au><au>Johnson, Angela K.</au><au>Runyon, Michael</au><au>Rose, Geoffrey</au><au>Johnson, Thomas</au><au>Templin, Megan</au><au>Norton, H. James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on Qualitative Assessments of Right Ventricular Dysfunction With Echocardiography in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2113</spage><epage>2120</epage><pages>2113-2120</pages><issn>0278-4297</issn><eissn>1550-9613</eissn><abstract>Objectives To evaluate observer agreement using qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction prognostication in submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods Two emergency physicians and 2 cardiologists independently reviewed 31 packets of goal‐directed echocardiographic video clips consisting of at least 3 windows obtained by emergency physicians from normotensive patients with PE. Nine packets were repeated to assess for intraobserver agreement. Right ventricular dysfunction criteria on goal‐directed echocardiography were as follows: RV enlargement was present, with a right‐to‐left ventricular basal diameter ratio of 1.0 or higher and blunting of the apex of the RV in 2 or more different windows; RV systolic dysfunction was present if the tricuspid annulus moved toward the apex 10 mm or less and there was RV free wall hypokinesis; and septal deviation was present with any flattening or deviation of the ventricular septum toward the left ventricle. Results Among the 4 participants, there was 83.9% agreement on the presence or absence of RV enlargement (κ = 0.84), 74.2% agreement on the presence or absence of RV systolic dysfunction (κ = 0.69), and 71.0% agreement on the presence or absence of septal deviation (κ = 0.59). Intraobserver agreement was 100% for each RV dysfunction variable for each observer (κ = 1.0). Conclusions Agreement was substantial for both severe RV enlargement and RV systolic dysfunction and moderate for septal deviation. Right ventricular dysfunction assessment with qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria is reproducible for PE risk stratification.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</pub><pmid>27503757</pmid><doi>10.7863/ultra.15.11007</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-4297
ispartof Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2016-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2113-2120
issn 0278-4297
1550-9613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1824223187
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects echocardiography
Echocardiography - methods
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging
Humans
observer agreement
Observer Variation
pulmonary embolism
Pulmonary Embolism - complications
Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging
Pulmonary Embolism - physiopathology
Reproducibility of Results
right ventricular dysfunction
Sensitivity and Specificity
Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - complications
Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging
Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology
title Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on Qualitative Assessments of Right Ventricular Dysfunction With Echocardiography in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A23%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interobserver%20and%20Intraobserver%20Agreement%20on%20Qualitative%20Assessments%20of%20Right%20Ventricular%20Dysfunction%20With%20Echocardiography%20in%20Patients%20With%20Pulmonary%20Embolism&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ultrasound%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Weekes,%20Anthony%20J.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2113&rft.epage=2120&rft.pages=2113-2120&rft.issn=0278-4297&rft.eissn=1550-9613&rft_id=info:doi/10.7863/ultra.15.11007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1824223187%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1824223187&rft_id=info:pmid/27503757&rfr_iscdi=true