Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on Qualitative Assessments of Right Ventricular Dysfunction With Echocardiography in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism
Objectives To evaluate observer agreement using qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction prognostication in submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods Two emergency physicians and 2 cardiologists independently reviewed 31 packets of goal‐directed e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2016-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2113-2120 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2120 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2113 |
container_title | Journal of ultrasound in medicine |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Weekes, Anthony J. Oh, Laura Thacker, Gregory Johnson, Angela K. Runyon, Michael Rose, Geoffrey Johnson, Thomas Templin, Megan Norton, H. James |
description | Objectives
To evaluate observer agreement using qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction prognostication in submassive pulmonary embolism (PE).
Methods
Two emergency physicians and 2 cardiologists independently reviewed 31 packets of goal‐directed echocardiographic video clips consisting of at least 3 windows obtained by emergency physicians from normotensive patients with PE. Nine packets were repeated to assess for intraobserver agreement. Right ventricular dysfunction criteria on goal‐directed echocardiography were as follows: RV enlargement was present, with a right‐to‐left ventricular basal diameter ratio of 1.0 or higher and blunting of the apex of the RV in 2 or more different windows; RV systolic dysfunction was present if the tricuspid annulus moved toward the apex 10 mm or less and there was RV free wall hypokinesis; and septal deviation was present with any flattening or deviation of the ventricular septum toward the left ventricle.
Results
Among the 4 participants, there was 83.9% agreement on the presence or absence of RV enlargement (κ = 0.84), 74.2% agreement on the presence or absence of RV systolic dysfunction (κ = 0.69), and 71.0% agreement on the presence or absence of septal deviation (κ = 0.59). Intraobserver agreement was 100% for each RV dysfunction variable for each observer (κ = 1.0).
Conclusions
Agreement was substantial for both severe RV enlargement and RV systolic dysfunction and moderate for septal deviation. Right ventricular dysfunction assessment with qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria is reproducible for PE risk stratification. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7863/ultra.15.11007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1824223187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1824223187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-f00055917f3a88ea8df3500000fa58df84b883fc067ad56c1f06b68603d9c30d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFuEzEQhi0EomngyhH5yGXDeB2vHXGKSqBFrVoQhaPl9dqJkXed2t6iPE1fFScpvdYXa8bf_GPpQ-gdgRkXDf04-hzVjLAZIQD8BZoQxqBaNIS-RBOouajm9YKfoNOU_gDUQPj8NTqpOQPKGZ-gh4shmxjaZOK9iVgNHS6dqJ46y3U0pjdDxmHA30flXVbZ3Ru8TMmktH9JOFj8w603Gf8qZXR69Criz7tkx0FnVwZ_u7zBK70JWsXOhXVU280OuwHflLBDxIG4GX0fBhV3eNW3wbvUv0GvrPLJvH28p-j2y-rn2Xl1ef314mx5WWkqOK0sADC2INxSJYRRorOUwf5YxUoh5q0Q1GpouOpYo4mFpm1EA7RbaAodnaIPx9xtDHejSVn2LmnjvRpMGJMkop7XNSVl2RTNjqiOIaVorNxG15dPSwJyL0UepEjC5EFKGXj_mD22veme8P8WCvDpCPx13uyeiZPfbq-Kx4YyAjUhlP4D--GeyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1824223187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on Qualitative Assessments of Right Ventricular Dysfunction With Echocardiography in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Weekes, Anthony J. ; Oh, Laura ; Thacker, Gregory ; Johnson, Angela K. ; Runyon, Michael ; Rose, Geoffrey ; Johnson, Thomas ; Templin, Megan ; Norton, H. James</creator><creatorcontrib>Weekes, Anthony J. ; Oh, Laura ; Thacker, Gregory ; Johnson, Angela K. ; Runyon, Michael ; Rose, Geoffrey ; Johnson, Thomas ; Templin, Megan ; Norton, H. James</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To evaluate observer agreement using qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction prognostication in submassive pulmonary embolism (PE).
Methods
Two emergency physicians and 2 cardiologists independently reviewed 31 packets of goal‐directed echocardiographic video clips consisting of at least 3 windows obtained by emergency physicians from normotensive patients with PE. Nine packets were repeated to assess for intraobserver agreement. Right ventricular dysfunction criteria on goal‐directed echocardiography were as follows: RV enlargement was present, with a right‐to‐left ventricular basal diameter ratio of 1.0 or higher and blunting of the apex of the RV in 2 or more different windows; RV systolic dysfunction was present if the tricuspid annulus moved toward the apex 10 mm or less and there was RV free wall hypokinesis; and septal deviation was present with any flattening or deviation of the ventricular septum toward the left ventricle.
Results
Among the 4 participants, there was 83.9% agreement on the presence or absence of RV enlargement (κ = 0.84), 74.2% agreement on the presence or absence of RV systolic dysfunction (κ = 0.69), and 71.0% agreement on the presence or absence of septal deviation (κ = 0.59). Intraobserver agreement was 100% for each RV dysfunction variable for each observer (κ = 1.0).
Conclusions
Agreement was substantial for both severe RV enlargement and RV systolic dysfunction and moderate for septal deviation. Right ventricular dysfunction assessment with qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria is reproducible for PE risk stratification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-9613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7863/ultra.15.11007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27503757</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</publisher><subject>echocardiography ; Echocardiography - methods ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; observer agreement ; Observer Variation ; pulmonary embolism ; Pulmonary Embolism - complications ; Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging ; Pulmonary Embolism - physiopathology ; Reproducibility of Results ; right ventricular dysfunction ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - complications ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2016-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2113-2120</ispartof><rights>2016 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-f00055917f3a88ea8df3500000fa58df84b883fc067ad56c1f06b68603d9c30d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-f00055917f3a88ea8df3500000fa58df84b883fc067ad56c1f06b68603d9c30d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.7863%2Fultra.15.11007$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.7863%2Fultra.15.11007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27503757$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weekes, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thacker, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Angela K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runyon, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Templin, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, H. James</creatorcontrib><title>Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on Qualitative Assessments of Right Ventricular Dysfunction With Echocardiography in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism</title><title>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</title><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><description>Objectives
To evaluate observer agreement using qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction prognostication in submassive pulmonary embolism (PE).
Methods
Two emergency physicians and 2 cardiologists independently reviewed 31 packets of goal‐directed echocardiographic video clips consisting of at least 3 windows obtained by emergency physicians from normotensive patients with PE. Nine packets were repeated to assess for intraobserver agreement. Right ventricular dysfunction criteria on goal‐directed echocardiography were as follows: RV enlargement was present, with a right‐to‐left ventricular basal diameter ratio of 1.0 or higher and blunting of the apex of the RV in 2 or more different windows; RV systolic dysfunction was present if the tricuspid annulus moved toward the apex 10 mm or less and there was RV free wall hypokinesis; and septal deviation was present with any flattening or deviation of the ventricular septum toward the left ventricle.
Results
Among the 4 participants, there was 83.9% agreement on the presence or absence of RV enlargement (κ = 0.84), 74.2% agreement on the presence or absence of RV systolic dysfunction (κ = 0.69), and 71.0% agreement on the presence or absence of septal deviation (κ = 0.59). Intraobserver agreement was 100% for each RV dysfunction variable for each observer (κ = 1.0).
Conclusions
Agreement was substantial for both severe RV enlargement and RV systolic dysfunction and moderate for septal deviation. Right ventricular dysfunction assessment with qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria is reproducible for PE risk stratification.</description><subject>echocardiography</subject><subject>Echocardiography - methods</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>observer agreement</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>pulmonary embolism</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - complications</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - physiopathology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>right ventricular dysfunction</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - complications</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology</subject><issn>0278-4297</issn><issn>1550-9613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFuEzEQhi0EomngyhH5yGXDeB2vHXGKSqBFrVoQhaPl9dqJkXed2t6iPE1fFScpvdYXa8bf_GPpQ-gdgRkXDf04-hzVjLAZIQD8BZoQxqBaNIS-RBOouajm9YKfoNOU_gDUQPj8NTqpOQPKGZ-gh4shmxjaZOK9iVgNHS6dqJ46y3U0pjdDxmHA30flXVbZ3Ru8TMmktH9JOFj8w603Gf8qZXR69Criz7tkx0FnVwZ_u7zBK70JWsXOhXVU280OuwHflLBDxIG4GX0fBhV3eNW3wbvUv0GvrPLJvH28p-j2y-rn2Xl1ef314mx5WWkqOK0sADC2INxSJYRRorOUwf5YxUoh5q0Q1GpouOpYo4mFpm1EA7RbaAodnaIPx9xtDHejSVn2LmnjvRpMGJMkop7XNSVl2RTNjqiOIaVorNxG15dPSwJyL0UepEjC5EFKGXj_mD22veme8P8WCvDpCPx13uyeiZPfbq-Kx4YyAjUhlP4D--GeyA</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Weekes, Anthony J.</creator><creator>Oh, Laura</creator><creator>Thacker, Gregory</creator><creator>Johnson, Angela K.</creator><creator>Runyon, Michael</creator><creator>Rose, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Johnson, Thomas</creator><creator>Templin, Megan</creator><creator>Norton, H. James</creator><general>American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on Qualitative Assessments of Right Ventricular Dysfunction With Echocardiography in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism</title><author>Weekes, Anthony J. ; Oh, Laura ; Thacker, Gregory ; Johnson, Angela K. ; Runyon, Michael ; Rose, Geoffrey ; Johnson, Thomas ; Templin, Megan ; Norton, H. James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3873-f00055917f3a88ea8df3500000fa58df84b883fc067ad56c1f06b68603d9c30d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>echocardiography</topic><topic>Echocardiography - methods</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>observer agreement</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>pulmonary embolism</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - complications</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - physiopathology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>right ventricular dysfunction</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - complications</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weekes, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thacker, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Angela K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Runyon, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Templin, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, H. James</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weekes, Anthony J.</au><au>Oh, Laura</au><au>Thacker, Gregory</au><au>Johnson, Angela K.</au><au>Runyon, Michael</au><au>Rose, Geoffrey</au><au>Johnson, Thomas</au><au>Templin, Megan</au><au>Norton, H. James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on Qualitative Assessments of Right Ventricular Dysfunction With Echocardiography in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2113</spage><epage>2120</epage><pages>2113-2120</pages><issn>0278-4297</issn><eissn>1550-9613</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To evaluate observer agreement using qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction prognostication in submassive pulmonary embolism (PE).
Methods
Two emergency physicians and 2 cardiologists independently reviewed 31 packets of goal‐directed echocardiographic video clips consisting of at least 3 windows obtained by emergency physicians from normotensive patients with PE. Nine packets were repeated to assess for intraobserver agreement. Right ventricular dysfunction criteria on goal‐directed echocardiography were as follows: RV enlargement was present, with a right‐to‐left ventricular basal diameter ratio of 1.0 or higher and blunting of the apex of the RV in 2 or more different windows; RV systolic dysfunction was present if the tricuspid annulus moved toward the apex 10 mm or less and there was RV free wall hypokinesis; and septal deviation was present with any flattening or deviation of the ventricular septum toward the left ventricle.
Results
Among the 4 participants, there was 83.9% agreement on the presence or absence of RV enlargement (κ = 0.84), 74.2% agreement on the presence or absence of RV systolic dysfunction (κ = 0.69), and 71.0% agreement on the presence or absence of septal deviation (κ = 0.59). Intraobserver agreement was 100% for each RV dysfunction variable for each observer (κ = 1.0).
Conclusions
Agreement was substantial for both severe RV enlargement and RV systolic dysfunction and moderate for septal deviation. Right ventricular dysfunction assessment with qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria is reproducible for PE risk stratification.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</pub><pmid>27503757</pmid><doi>10.7863/ultra.15.11007</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-4297 |
ispartof | Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2016-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2113-2120 |
issn | 0278-4297 1550-9613 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1824223187 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | echocardiography Echocardiography - methods Evaluation Studies as Topic Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging Humans observer agreement Observer Variation pulmonary embolism Pulmonary Embolism - complications Pulmonary Embolism - diagnostic imaging Pulmonary Embolism - physiopathology Reproducibility of Results right ventricular dysfunction Sensitivity and Specificity Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - complications Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology |
title | Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on Qualitative Assessments of Right Ventricular Dysfunction With Echocardiography in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A23%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interobserver%20and%20Intraobserver%20Agreement%20on%20Qualitative%20Assessments%20of%20Right%20Ventricular%20Dysfunction%20With%20Echocardiography%20in%20Patients%20With%20Pulmonary%20Embolism&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ultrasound%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Weekes,%20Anthony%20J.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2113&rft.epage=2120&rft.pages=2113-2120&rft.issn=0278-4297&rft.eissn=1550-9613&rft_id=info:doi/10.7863/ultra.15.11007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1824223187%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1824223187&rft_id=info:pmid/27503757&rfr_iscdi=true |