Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on Qualitative Assessments of Right Ventricular Dysfunction With Echocardiography in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism

Objectives To evaluate observer agreement using qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction prognostication in submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods Two emergency physicians and 2 cardiologists independently reviewed 31 packets of goal‐directed e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2016-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2113-2120
Hauptverfasser: Weekes, Anthony J., Oh, Laura, Thacker, Gregory, Johnson, Angela K., Runyon, Michael, Rose, Geoffrey, Johnson, Thomas, Templin, Megan, Norton, H. James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To evaluate observer agreement using qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria for right ventricular (RV) dysfunction prognostication in submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods Two emergency physicians and 2 cardiologists independently reviewed 31 packets of goal‐directed echocardiographic video clips consisting of at least 3 windows obtained by emergency physicians from normotensive patients with PE. Nine packets were repeated to assess for intraobserver agreement. Right ventricular dysfunction criteria on goal‐directed echocardiography were as follows: RV enlargement was present, with a right‐to‐left ventricular basal diameter ratio of 1.0 or higher and blunting of the apex of the RV in 2 or more different windows; RV systolic dysfunction was present if the tricuspid annulus moved toward the apex 10 mm or less and there was RV free wall hypokinesis; and septal deviation was present with any flattening or deviation of the ventricular septum toward the left ventricle. Results Among the 4 participants, there was 83.9% agreement on the presence or absence of RV enlargement (κ = 0.84), 74.2% agreement on the presence or absence of RV systolic dysfunction (κ = 0.69), and 71.0% agreement on the presence or absence of septal deviation (κ = 0.59). Intraobserver agreement was 100% for each RV dysfunction variable for each observer (κ = 1.0). Conclusions Agreement was substantial for both severe RV enlargement and RV systolic dysfunction and moderate for septal deviation. Right ventricular dysfunction assessment with qualitative goal‐directed echocardiographic criteria is reproducible for PE risk stratification.
ISSN:0278-4297
1550-9613
DOI:10.7863/ultra.15.11007