Mellor-Yamada simplified second-order closure models : analysis and application of the generalized von Karman local similarity hypothesis

Mellor-Yamada's ``superequilibrium'' Level 2 and Level 1 models are analyzed using the Monin-Obukhov theory framework. Yamada's (1975) analysis is supplemented by a discussion of the realizability requirements posed on model constants and by the inclusion of the master-length sca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Boundary-layer meteorology 1992-04, Vol.59 (1-2), p.83-109
1. Verfasser: Lobocki, Lech
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Mellor-Yamada's ``superequilibrium'' Level 2 and Level 1 models are analyzed using the Monin-Obukhov theory framework. Yamada's (1975) analysis is supplemented by a discussion of the realizability requirements posed on model constants and by the inclusion of the master-length scale problem. The generalized von Karman local similarity hypothesis (Laikhtman, 1979) is examined as an alternative closure hypothesis for second-order models. A systematic method of model examination is used. First, a family of models, consisting of Level 1 and Level 2 Reynolds-stress equation sets and different length-scale hypotheses (Prandtl's, generalized von Karman's), is built. Next, asymptotic characteristics of individual models are investigated and compared with similarity predictions. Monin-Obukhov universal functions for turbulent energy, space scale and temperature variance, derived from the models, are compared with experimental surface-layer data. Generally, models employing the stability-dependent generalized von Karman hypothesis perform better than those that use the conventional Prandtl mixing-length concept. The choice amongst the von Karman type models is still ambiguous. However, the Level 1 model with a stability-dependent generalized von Karman length scale seems to be the best of those considered.
ISSN:0006-8314
1573-1472
DOI:10.1007/BF00120688