Oxidation of edible animal fats. Comparison of the performance of different quantification methods and of a proposed new semi-objective colour scale-based method

•The performance of methods used for fat oxidation assessment was compared.•Samples of three types of animal fats with different oxidation level were analyzed.•A new method for fat oxidation assessment based in colour scales was developed.•This new method was compared with classical methods in terms...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food chemistry 2017-02, Vol.217, p.743-749
Hauptverfasser: Méndez-Cid, Francisco J., Lorenzo, José M., Martínez, Sidonia, Carballo, Javier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•The performance of methods used for fat oxidation assessment was compared.•Samples of three types of animal fats with different oxidation level were analyzed.•A new method for fat oxidation assessment based in colour scales was developed.•This new method was compared with classical methods in terms of results.•Results from the new method reasonably correlated with those from other methods. The agreement among the results determined for the main parameters used in the evaluation of the fat auto-oxidation was investigated in animal fats (butter fat, subcutaneous pig back-fat and subcutaneous ham fat). Also, graduated colour scales representing the colour change during storage/ripening were developed for the three types of fat, and the values read in these scales were correlated with the values observed for the different parameters indicating fat oxidation. In general good correlation among the values of the different parameters was observed (e.g. TBA value correlated with the peroxide value: r=0.466 for butter and r=0.898 for back-fat). A reasonable correlation was observed between the values read in the developed colour scales and the values for the other parameters determined (e.g. values of r=0.320 and r=0.793 with peroxide value for butter and back-fat, respectively, and of r=0.767 and r=0.498 with TBA value for back-fat and ham fat, respectively).
ISSN:0308-8146
1873-7072
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.009