Replacing cystoscopy by urine markers in the follow-up of patients with low-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer?—An International Bladder Cancer Network project

Abstract Rationale Numerous molecular urine markers for the diagnosis of bladder cancer have been developed and evaluated mostly in case-control settings through the past decades. However, despite all efforts none of them has been included into clinical decision-making and guideline recommendations...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urologic oncology 2016-10, Vol.34 (10), p.452-459
Hauptverfasser: Schmitz-Dräger, Claudia, MD, Bonberg, Nadine, PhD, Pesch, Beate, PhD, Todenhöfer, Tilman, MD, Sahin, Sevim, MD, Behrens, Thomas, MD, Brüning, Thomas, MD, PhD, Schmitz-Dräger, Bernd J., MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Rationale Numerous molecular urine markers for the diagnosis of bladder cancer have been developed and evaluated mostly in case-control settings through the past decades. However, despite all efforts none of them has been included into clinical decision-making and guideline recommendations until today. The aim of this retrospective longitudinal analysis was to investigate if a molecular marker might be able to replace cystoscopy as a primary examination in diagnosis and follow-up of patients with pTa grade 1-2 bladder cancer. Materials and methods Totally 36 patients (32 men) with pTa grade 1-2 bladder cancer underwent 232 follow-up examinations including urine analysis, cytology, immunocytology (uCyt+), and urethrocystoscopy (UC). Mean age at study entry was 63 years. Patients were observed through a median follow-up interval of 3.8 years. Results In summary, 47 Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors (TURB) procedures were indicated based upon a positive UC (44) or as re-TURB (3) and 33 tumors (plus 1 case of pTa G0) were histopathologically confirmed. Although uCyt+was positive in 12/13 primary tumors (92.3%), sensitivity dropped to 13/20 (65%) in tumor recurrence presumably because of their smaller size. Urine cytology had a sensitivity and a specificity of 30.3% and 94.9%, respectively, but did not improve the sensitivity of uCyt+alone. If UC was based upon a positive uCyt+test, 8/33 tumors (24.2%) would have been overlooked or diagnosed late. In contrast, 173 UCs (74%) would have been saved and 5 presumably unnecessary TURB procedures would not have been indicated. Conclusions This longitudinal study suggests a potential of molecular urine tests in replacing cystoscopy in the follow-up of patients with pTa G1-2 bladder cancer. The use of additional markers might further improve sensitivity of urine testing. A prospective randomized study has been initiated to prospectively investigate the performance of a marker panel against UC.
ISSN:1078-1439
1873-2496
DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.06.001