Comparison between various densities of pore titanium meshes and e-polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membrane regarding bone regeneration induced by low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) in rabbit nasal bone

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare bone regenerative capability following use of polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membrane against that when various densities of pore titanium meshes are used with and without low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS). Materials and methods Adult...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2016-09, Vol.44 (9), p.1152-1161
Hauptverfasser: Masatoshi, Higuchi, DDS, Moroi, Akinori, DDS, PhD, Yoshizawa, Kunio, DDS, PhD, Kosaka, Akihiko, DDS, Ikawa, Hiroumi, DDS, Iguchi, Ran, DDS, Saida, Yuriko, DDS, Hotta, Asami, DDS, Tsutsui, Takamitsu, DDS, Ueki, Koichiro, DDS, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare bone regenerative capability following use of polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membrane against that when various densities of pore titanium meshes are used with and without low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS). Materials and methods Adult male white rabbits were divided into 8 groups. In 4 groups, after incising along the nasal bone, four 3 × 8mm bone defects were made in both sides and covered by an ePTFE membrane (group E: n=15), a high density pore titanium mesh (group H: n=15), a low density pore titanium mesh (group L: n=15), and no mesh (control) (group C: n=15). Furthermore, LIPUS was irradiated after surgery in 4 groups (groups EL, HL, LL and CL, in each n=15). The rabbits were sacrificed at 1, 2 and 8 weeks postoperative, and formalin-fixed specimens were embedded in acrylic resin. The specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. For immunohistochemical analysis, the specimens were treated with bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 antibody. Results Group H had significantly higher values than groups L, E, and C regarding bone area ratio and labeling index of BMP-2 positive cells (P
ISSN:1010-5182
1878-4119
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2016.06.029