Developmental Outcome and Related Abnormalities in Goats: Comparison Between Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer- and In Vivo-Derived Concepti During Pregnancy Through Term

Cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is characterized by low efficiency and the occurrence of developmental abnormalities, which are rather poorly studied phenomena in goats. This study aimed at comparing overall SCNT efficiency in goats by using in vitro-matured (IVM) or in vivo-matured...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cellular reprogramming 2016-08, Vol.18 (4), p.264-279
Hauptverfasser: Martins, Leonardo Tondello, Neto, Saul Gaudêncio, Tavares, Kaio César Simiano, Calderón, Carlos Enrique Méndez, Aguiar, Luis Henrique, Lazzarotto, Cícera Regina, Ongaratto, Felipe Ledur, Rodrigues, Victor Hugo Vieira, Carneiro, Igor de Sá, Rossetto, Rafael, Almeida, Anderson Pinto, Fernandes, César Carneiro Linhares, Rondina, Davide, Dias, Ana Christina Oliveira, Chies, Jocelei Maria, Polejaeva, Irina A, Rodrigues, José Luiz, Forell, Fabiana, Bertolini, Luciana Relly, Bertolini, Marcelo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is characterized by low efficiency and the occurrence of developmental abnormalities, which are rather poorly studied phenomena in goats. This study aimed at comparing overall SCNT efficiency in goats by using in vitro-matured (IVM) or in vivo-matured oocytes and fibroblast donor cells (mock transfected, transgenic, or wild type), also characterizing symptoms of the Abnormal Offspring Syndrome (AOS) in development, comparing results with pregnancies produced by artificial insemination (AI) and in vivo-derived (IVD) embryos. The SCNT group had lower pregnancy rate (18.3%, 11/60), total number of concepti (20.0%, 12/60), term births (3.3%, 2/60), and live births (1.7%, 1/60) than both the IVD (77.8%, 7/9; 155.5%, 14/9; 122.2%, 11/9; 88.8%, 8/9) and the AI (71.4%, 10/14; 121.4%, 17/14; 100%, 14/14; 78.5%, 11/14) groups, respectively (p 
ISSN:2152-4971
2152-4998
DOI:10.1089/cell.2015.0082