Clinical Evaluation of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography

Objective To explore the feasibility of dual‐source computed tomography (DSCT) in the evaluation of coronary in‐stent restenosis (ISR) by comparing the results of DSCT and selective coronary angiography (CAG). Methods In‐stent restenosis examination results from DSCT were compared with those obtaine...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2015-11, Vol.32 (11), p.1681-1687
Hauptverfasser:	Wang, Lian-Fa, Tao, Li-Wei, Huang, Meng-Xun, Liao, Wen-Bin, Zhu, You-Zhi, Zhou, Wen-Bing, Li, Hua, Li, Dan, Lu, Hong-Tao, Zhang, Bang-Zhu, Chen, Zhen
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Coronary Angiography Coronary Restenosis - diagnostic imaging dual-source CT Feasibility Studies Female Humans in-stent restenosis Male Middle Aged Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Stents Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Objective To explore the feasibility of dual‐source computed tomography (DSCT) in the evaluation of coronary in‐stent restenosis (ISR) by comparing the results of DSCT and selective coronary angiography (CAG). Methods In‐stent restenosis examination results from DSCT were compared with those obtained using CAG. Results Among 173 stents studied, 156 yielded good quality images when evaluated with DSCT. CAG identified 38 ISR cases, while DSCT found 40. Among the 112 stents in the study with an inner diameter ≥3.0 mm, CAG identified 29 as having ISR, while DSCT reported the same finding in 30; among the 44 stents with inner diameter
ISSN:	0742-2822 1540-8175
DOI:	10.1111/echo.12932