Intravesical Hemostatic Clip Migration After Robotic Prostatectomy: Case Series and Review of the Literature

The Weck Hem-o-lok™ Ligating clip is a routinely used hemostatic tool in robotic and laparoscopic surgery. It has been the practice in our institution to use such clips for hemostasis of the vascular bundles during robotic prostatectomy. Migration of such clips has been reported in the literature as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A 2016-09, Vol.26 (9), p.710-712
Hauptverfasser: Turini, 3rd, George A, Brito, 3rd, Joseph M, Leone, Andrew R, Golijanin, Dragan, Miller, E Bradley, Pareek, Gyan, Renzulli, 2nd, Joseph F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 712
container_issue 9
container_start_page 710
container_title Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A
container_volume 26
creator Turini, 3rd, George A
Brito, 3rd, Joseph M
Leone, Andrew R
Golijanin, Dragan
Miller, E Bradley
Pareek, Gyan
Renzulli, 2nd, Joseph F
description The Weck Hem-o-lok™ Ligating clip is a routinely used hemostatic tool in robotic and laparoscopic surgery. It has been the practice in our institution to use such clips for hemostasis of the vascular bundles during robotic prostatectomy. Migration of such clips has been reported in the literature as single case reports. In this study, we present a case series of intravesical Weck clip extrusions presenting as bladder calculi. Such events have led to a change in our practice, and more research is needed to assess the impact of this change. A retrospective chart review was conducted over the period 2006-2011. Patients included in the study required cystoscopic intervention for removal of encrusted or impacted Weck clips. Primary data points included type of intervention required, time to presentation, and number of presentations. Postoperative anastomotic leak, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and initial operative time were also investigated. Out of 570 total men undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP), eight required return to the operating room for clip extraction (1.4%). Extraction methods included laser lithotripsy, blunt litholapaxy, and grasper extraction. Men experiencing clip migration were hospitalized for a longer period of time (7.6 days vs. 2.1 days, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1089/lap.2015.0506
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1817848508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1817848508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-d0a31da2ef1f057fec2af6fb31e9a0371c4252b7dad536f7180118c0592b44213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMQCMEYmNw5Ipy5NKRj6ZNuE0TsElDoAHnKk0dCGrXkaRD-_d0bOCLbfnZkh9Cl5SMKZHqptbrMSNUjIkg2REaUiHyRBGeHvc1USzJUqYG6CyET9KH4ukpGrCcZ0wqOUT1fBW93kBwRtd4Bk0boo7O4Gnt1vjRvfu-a1d4YiN4vGzLdjd89r8YmNg221s81QHwC3gHAetVhZewcfCNW4vjB-CF61d17DycoxOr6wAXhzxCb_d3r9NZsnh6mE8ni8QwxWNSEc1ppRlYaonILRimbWZLTkFpwnNqUiZYmVe6EjyzOZWEUmmIUKxMU0b5CF3v7659-9VBiEXjgoG61itou1BQSXOZSkFkjyZ71PQvBQ-2WHvXaL8tKCl2gotecLETXOwE9_zV4XRXNlD9039G-Q99bHdc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1817848508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intravesical Hemostatic Clip Migration After Robotic Prostatectomy: Case Series and Review of the Literature</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Turini, 3rd, George A ; Brito, 3rd, Joseph M ; Leone, Andrew R ; Golijanin, Dragan ; Miller, E Bradley ; Pareek, Gyan ; Renzulli, 2nd, Joseph F</creator><creatorcontrib>Turini, 3rd, George A ; Brito, 3rd, Joseph M ; Leone, Andrew R ; Golijanin, Dragan ; Miller, E Bradley ; Pareek, Gyan ; Renzulli, 2nd, Joseph F</creatorcontrib><description>The Weck Hem-o-lok™ Ligating clip is a routinely used hemostatic tool in robotic and laparoscopic surgery. It has been the practice in our institution to use such clips for hemostasis of the vascular bundles during robotic prostatectomy. Migration of such clips has been reported in the literature as single case reports. In this study, we present a case series of intravesical Weck clip extrusions presenting as bladder calculi. Such events have led to a change in our practice, and more research is needed to assess the impact of this change. A retrospective chart review was conducted over the period 2006-2011. Patients included in the study required cystoscopic intervention for removal of encrusted or impacted Weck clips. Primary data points included type of intervention required, time to presentation, and number of presentations. Postoperative anastomotic leak, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and initial operative time were also investigated. Out of 570 total men undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP), eight required return to the operating room for clip extraction (1.4%). Extraction methods included laser lithotripsy, blunt litholapaxy, and grasper extraction. Men experiencing clip migration were hospitalized for a longer period of time (7.6 days vs. 2.1 days, P &lt; .01) and they required more blood transfusions (1.4 units vs. 0.05 units, P &lt; .01) than men who did not experience clip migration. The most common site for clip intrusion was the bladder neck. Average time to presentation was 1.75 years. Weck clip migration is a recognized complication of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Men with recurrent urinary tract infection, bothersome voiding symptoms, or hematuria following RALRP should be considered for cystoscopic evaluation. Increased length of hospital stays and the need for a larger volume blood transfusion following prostatectomy were significant predictors of clip migration. More research is needed to determine if implemented changes to our surgical technique have mitigated these risks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-6429</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/lap.2015.0506</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27362898</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Foreign Bodies - etiology ; Foreign Bodies - surgery ; Hematuria - etiology ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy - instrumentation ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Prostatectomy - adverse effects ; Prostatectomy - instrumentation ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation ; Surgical Instruments - adverse effects ; Urinary Bladder ; Urinary Tract Infections - etiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of laparoendoscopic &amp; advanced surgical techniques. Part A, 2016-09, Vol.26 (9), p.710-712</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-d0a31da2ef1f057fec2af6fb31e9a0371c4252b7dad536f7180118c0592b44213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-d0a31da2ef1f057fec2af6fb31e9a0371c4252b7dad536f7180118c0592b44213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27362898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turini, 3rd, George A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, 3rd, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leone, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golijanin, Dragan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, E Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pareek, Gyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renzulli, 2nd, Joseph F</creatorcontrib><title>Intravesical Hemostatic Clip Migration After Robotic Prostatectomy: Case Series and Review of the Literature</title><title>Journal of laparoendoscopic &amp; advanced surgical techniques. Part A</title><addtitle>J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A</addtitle><description>The Weck Hem-o-lok™ Ligating clip is a routinely used hemostatic tool in robotic and laparoscopic surgery. It has been the practice in our institution to use such clips for hemostasis of the vascular bundles during robotic prostatectomy. Migration of such clips has been reported in the literature as single case reports. In this study, we present a case series of intravesical Weck clip extrusions presenting as bladder calculi. Such events have led to a change in our practice, and more research is needed to assess the impact of this change. A retrospective chart review was conducted over the period 2006-2011. Patients included in the study required cystoscopic intervention for removal of encrusted or impacted Weck clips. Primary data points included type of intervention required, time to presentation, and number of presentations. Postoperative anastomotic leak, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and initial operative time were also investigated. Out of 570 total men undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP), eight required return to the operating room for clip extraction (1.4%). Extraction methods included laser lithotripsy, blunt litholapaxy, and grasper extraction. Men experiencing clip migration were hospitalized for a longer period of time (7.6 days vs. 2.1 days, P &lt; .01) and they required more blood transfusions (1.4 units vs. 0.05 units, P &lt; .01) than men who did not experience clip migration. The most common site for clip intrusion was the bladder neck. Average time to presentation was 1.75 years. Weck clip migration is a recognized complication of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Men with recurrent urinary tract infection, bothersome voiding symptoms, or hematuria following RALRP should be considered for cystoscopic evaluation. Increased length of hospital stays and the need for a larger volume blood transfusion following prostatectomy were significant predictors of clip migration. More research is needed to determine if implemented changes to our surgical technique have mitigated these risks.</description><subject>Foreign Bodies - etiology</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - surgery</subject><subject>Hematuria - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Surgical Instruments - adverse effects</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - etiology</subject><issn>1092-6429</issn><issn>1557-9034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMQCMEYmNw5Ipy5NKRj6ZNuE0TsElDoAHnKk0dCGrXkaRD-_d0bOCLbfnZkh9Cl5SMKZHqptbrMSNUjIkg2REaUiHyRBGeHvc1USzJUqYG6CyET9KH4ukpGrCcZ0wqOUT1fBW93kBwRtd4Bk0boo7O4Gnt1vjRvfu-a1d4YiN4vGzLdjd89r8YmNg221s81QHwC3gHAetVhZewcfCNW4vjB-CF61d17DycoxOr6wAXhzxCb_d3r9NZsnh6mE8ni8QwxWNSEc1ppRlYaonILRimbWZLTkFpwnNqUiZYmVe6EjyzOZWEUmmIUKxMU0b5CF3v7659-9VBiEXjgoG61itou1BQSXOZSkFkjyZ71PQvBQ-2WHvXaL8tKCl2gotecLETXOwE9_zV4XRXNlD9039G-Q99bHdc</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Turini, 3rd, George A</creator><creator>Brito, 3rd, Joseph M</creator><creator>Leone, Andrew R</creator><creator>Golijanin, Dragan</creator><creator>Miller, E Bradley</creator><creator>Pareek, Gyan</creator><creator>Renzulli, 2nd, Joseph F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Intravesical Hemostatic Clip Migration After Robotic Prostatectomy: Case Series and Review of the Literature</title><author>Turini, 3rd, George A ; Brito, 3rd, Joseph M ; Leone, Andrew R ; Golijanin, Dragan ; Miller, E Bradley ; Pareek, Gyan ; Renzulli, 2nd, Joseph F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-d0a31da2ef1f057fec2af6fb31e9a0371c4252b7dad536f7180118c0592b44213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Foreign Bodies - etiology</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - surgery</topic><topic>Hematuria - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Surgical Instruments - adverse effects</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turini, 3rd, George A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, 3rd, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leone, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golijanin, Dragan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, E Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pareek, Gyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renzulli, 2nd, Joseph F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of laparoendoscopic &amp; advanced surgical techniques. Part A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turini, 3rd, George A</au><au>Brito, 3rd, Joseph M</au><au>Leone, Andrew R</au><au>Golijanin, Dragan</au><au>Miller, E Bradley</au><au>Pareek, Gyan</au><au>Renzulli, 2nd, Joseph F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intravesical Hemostatic Clip Migration After Robotic Prostatectomy: Case Series and Review of the Literature</atitle><jtitle>Journal of laparoendoscopic &amp; advanced surgical techniques. Part A</jtitle><addtitle>J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>710</spage><epage>712</epage><pages>710-712</pages><issn>1092-6429</issn><eissn>1557-9034</eissn><abstract>The Weck Hem-o-lok™ Ligating clip is a routinely used hemostatic tool in robotic and laparoscopic surgery. It has been the practice in our institution to use such clips for hemostasis of the vascular bundles during robotic prostatectomy. Migration of such clips has been reported in the literature as single case reports. In this study, we present a case series of intravesical Weck clip extrusions presenting as bladder calculi. Such events have led to a change in our practice, and more research is needed to assess the impact of this change. A retrospective chart review was conducted over the period 2006-2011. Patients included in the study required cystoscopic intervention for removal of encrusted or impacted Weck clips. Primary data points included type of intervention required, time to presentation, and number of presentations. Postoperative anastomotic leak, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and initial operative time were also investigated. Out of 570 total men undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP), eight required return to the operating room for clip extraction (1.4%). Extraction methods included laser lithotripsy, blunt litholapaxy, and grasper extraction. Men experiencing clip migration were hospitalized for a longer period of time (7.6 days vs. 2.1 days, P &lt; .01) and they required more blood transfusions (1.4 units vs. 0.05 units, P &lt; .01) than men who did not experience clip migration. The most common site for clip intrusion was the bladder neck. Average time to presentation was 1.75 years. Weck clip migration is a recognized complication of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Men with recurrent urinary tract infection, bothersome voiding symptoms, or hematuria following RALRP should be considered for cystoscopic evaluation. Increased length of hospital stays and the need for a larger volume blood transfusion following prostatectomy were significant predictors of clip migration. More research is needed to determine if implemented changes to our surgical technique have mitigated these risks.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>27362898</pmid><doi>10.1089/lap.2015.0506</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-6429
ispartof Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A, 2016-09, Vol.26 (9), p.710-712
issn 1092-6429
1557-9034
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1817848508
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Foreign Bodies - etiology
Foreign Bodies - surgery
Hematuria - etiology
Humans
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Laparoscopy - instrumentation
Laparoscopy - methods
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Prostatectomy - adverse effects
Prostatectomy - instrumentation
Prostatectomy - methods
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Robotic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation
Surgical Instruments - adverse effects
Urinary Bladder
Urinary Tract Infections - etiology
title Intravesical Hemostatic Clip Migration After Robotic Prostatectomy: Case Series and Review of the Literature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A07%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intravesical%20Hemostatic%20Clip%20Migration%20After%20Robotic%20Prostatectomy:%20Case%20Series%20and%20Review%20of%20the%20Literature&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20laparoendoscopic%20&%20advanced%20surgical%20techniques.%20Part%20A&rft.au=Turini,%203rd,%20George%20A&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=710&rft.epage=712&rft.pages=710-712&rft.issn=1092-6429&rft.eissn=1557-9034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/lap.2015.0506&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1817848508%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1817848508&rft_id=info:pmid/27362898&rfr_iscdi=true