Intravesical Hemostatic Clip Migration After Robotic Prostatectomy: Case Series and Review of the Literature
The Weck Hem-o-lok™ Ligating clip is a routinely used hemostatic tool in robotic and laparoscopic surgery. It has been the practice in our institution to use such clips for hemostasis of the vascular bundles during robotic prostatectomy. Migration of such clips has been reported in the literature as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A 2016-09, Vol.26 (9), p.710-712 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The Weck Hem-o-lok™ Ligating clip is a routinely used hemostatic tool in robotic and laparoscopic surgery. It has been the practice in our institution to use such clips for hemostasis of the vascular bundles during robotic prostatectomy. Migration of such clips has been reported in the literature as single case reports. In this study, we present a case series of intravesical Weck clip extrusions presenting as bladder calculi. Such events have led to a change in our practice, and more research is needed to assess the impact of this change.
A retrospective chart review was conducted over the period 2006-2011. Patients included in the study required cystoscopic intervention for removal of encrusted or impacted Weck clips. Primary data points included type of intervention required, time to presentation, and number of presentations. Postoperative anastomotic leak, duration of postoperative hospital stay, and initial operative time were also investigated.
Out of 570 total men undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP), eight required return to the operating room for clip extraction (1.4%). Extraction methods included laser lithotripsy, blunt litholapaxy, and grasper extraction. Men experiencing clip migration were hospitalized for a longer period of time (7.6 days vs. 2.1 days, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1092-6429 1557-9034 |
DOI: | 10.1089/lap.2015.0506 |