Comparison of the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations for cataract surgery in eyes after phototherapeutic keratectomy
Purpose To compare the accuracy of several methods of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations used for cataract surgery in eyes treated with phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) that results in changes in the anterior corneal surface and axial length; these results make power calculations less predi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Japanese journal of ophthalmology 2016-09, Vol.60 (5), p.365-372 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To compare the accuracy of several methods of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations used for cataract surgery in eyes treated with phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) that results in changes in the anterior corneal surface and axial length; these results make power calculations less predictable.
Methods
We evaluated the medical records of 23 eyes of 13 patients (mean age, 68.8 years; range 62–80 years) who underwent cataract surgery after PTK at Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. The prediction error, defined as the difference between the estimated postoperative spherical equivalent and the postoperative manifest refraction at the spectacle plane, was calculated using five formulas: SRK/T, Haigis-L, Shammas-PL, Camellin–Calossi, and OKULIX ray tracing software. We compared the median values of the arithmetic and absolute prediction errors among the five formulas.
Results
The median arithmetic errors after cataract surgery for the five formulas were 0.70 D (diopter) (range −0.41 to 2.78), −0.96 D (range −2.14 to 0.81), −0.81 D (range −1.89 to 1.15), −0.04 D (range −1.35 to 1.47), and 0.68 D (range −0.61 to 2.50), respectively.
Conclusion
The Camellin–Calossi formula is a good option for calculating IOL powers in eyes that underwent PTK. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-5155 1613-2246 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10384-016-0452-2 |