Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation on Short-Term Outcomes for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: A Meta-analysis

Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) has emerged as a component of the standard treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The primary benefit of NCRT is an improvement in long-term survival; however, the impact of NCRT on short-term outcomes is unclear. Methods A comprehensive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2016-10, Vol.23 (11), p.3632-3640
Hauptverfasser: Sathornviriyapong, Suun, Matsuda, Akihisa, Miyashita, Masao, Matsumoto, Satoshi, Sakurazawa, Nobuyuki, Kawano, Yoichi, Yamada, Marina, Uchida, Eiji
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) has emerged as a component of the standard treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The primary benefit of NCRT is an improvement in long-term survival; however, the impact of NCRT on short-term outcomes is unclear. Methods A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed via the MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases through November 2015 for the inclusion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated short-term outcomes of patients administered NCRT followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for resectable esophageal SCC. The main outcome measures were postoperative mortality and morbidity. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Results Eight RCTs were included, for a total of 1058 patients. Meta-analysis of the overall postoperative mortality and cardiopulmonary complication rates showed that there was a significant increase for patients administered NCRT followed by surgery compared with surgery alone (OR 1.87, 95 % CI 1.07–3.28, p  = 0.03, number of patients needed to harm = 33.3; and OR 2.12, 95 % CI 1.03–4.35, p  = 0.04, respectively). Dropout before surgery was higher for patients in the NCRT followed by surgery group compared with patients in the surgery-alone group. NCRT has no statistically impact on anastomosis and other complications compared with surgery alone. Conclusions NCRT for esophageal SCC significantly increases postoperative mortality and cardiopulmonary complications.
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-016-5298-9