Na ion- Conducting Ceramic as Solid Electrolyte for Rechargeable Seawater Batteries
[Display omitted] •Rechargeable seawater batteries are assembled using two Na+ conducting ceramics.•The battery with β″-Al2O3 electrolyte is irreversible even at 1 cycle.•The battery with NASICON shows a coulombic efficiency of 91% after 20 cycles.•NASICON is much more stable in seawater than β″-Al2...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Electrochimica acta 2016-02, Vol.191, p.1-7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | [Display omitted]
•Rechargeable seawater batteries are assembled using two Na+ conducting ceramics.•The battery with β″-Al2O3 electrolyte is irreversible even at 1 cycle.•The battery with NASICON shows a coulombic efficiency of 91% after 20 cycles.•NASICON is much more stable in seawater than β″-Al2O3.
This study describes the assembly of a rechargeable seawater battery using hard carbon as the anode, seawater as the cathode, and a fast Na ion-conducting ceramic as the solid electrolyte. Two different Na ion-conducting ceramics, β″-Al2O3 and Na3Zr2Si2PO12 (NASICON), are used as the solid electrolytes in this study. The discharge capacity of the seawater battery with the NASICON solid electrolyte is 120mAhg−1 after the first cycle and over 91% coulombic efficiency after twenty cycles. However, under the same experimental conditions, the discharge capacity of the seawater battery with a β"-Al2O3 electrolyte significantly drops to 10mAhg−1 after one cycle. It is observed that the stability of NASICON in seawater is superior to that of β"-Al2O3 and impedance results of NASICON are not changed significantly compared to that of β"-Al2O3 after cycling tests. The stability of Na ion-conducting ceramics in seawater and their effects on the electrochemical performance of seawater batteries are presented and discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0013-4686 1873-3859 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.054 |