Application of a random effects negative binomial model to examine tram-involved crash frequency on route sections in Melbourne, Australia
•Key factors influencing tram-involved crash frequency was identified.•A random effects negative binomial model was adopted.•Major crash contributing factors were tram stop spacing and tram service frequency.•Other factors were tram route section length and general traffic volume.•The results showed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Accident analysis and prevention 2016-07, Vol.92, p.15-21 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Key factors influencing tram-involved crash frequency was identified.•A random effects negative binomial model was adopted.•Major crash contributing factors were tram stop spacing and tram service frequency.•Other factors were tram route section length and general traffic volume.•The results showed positive road safety benefits of tram priority measures.
Safety is a key concern in the design, operation and development of light rail systems including trams or streetcars as they impose crash risks on road users in terms of crash frequency and severity. The aim of this study is to identify key traffic, transit and route factors that influence tram-involved crash frequencies along tram route sections in Melbourne. A random effects negative binomial (RENB) regression model was developed to analyze crash frequency data obtained from Yarra Trams, the tram operator in Melbourne. The RENB modelling approach can account for spatial and temporal variations within observation groups in panel count data structures by assuming that group specific effects are randomly distributed across locations. The results identify many significant factors effecting tram-involved crash frequency including tram service frequency (2.71), tram stop spacing (−0.42), tram route section length (0.31), tram signal priority (−0.25), general traffic volume (0.18), tram lane priority (−0.15) and ratio of platform tram stops (−0.09). Findings provide useful insights on route section level tram-involved crashes in an urban tram or streetcar operating environment. The method described represents a useful planning tool for transit agencies hoping to improve safety performance. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-4575 1879-2057 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.012 |