Computed Tomography Observer Agreement in Staging Malignant Lymphoma
To determine pretreatment computed tomography observer agreement in patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma. Forty-nine computed tomography scans were reviewed by 3 experienced radiologists, with each scan assessed twice by 1 observer. Predefined nodal and extranodal regions were assessed, and Ann Ar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of computer assisted tomography 2016-03, Vol.40 (2), p.261-265 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To determine pretreatment computed tomography observer agreement in patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma.
Forty-nine computed tomography scans were reviewed by 3 experienced radiologists, with each scan assessed twice by 1 observer. Predefined nodal and extranodal regions were assessed, and Ann Arbor stages were assigned. K-statistics were defined as poor (κ < 0.2), fair (κ > 0.2 to κ ≤ 0.4), moderate (κ > 0.4 to κ ≤ 0.6), substantial (κ > 0.6 to κ ≤ 0.8), and almost perfect (κ > 0.8 to κ ≤ 1).
Nodal interobserver agreement varied from 0.09 for infraclavicular involvement to 0.95 for para-iliac involvement; intraobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect, except for infraclavicular nodes. Extranodal interobserver agreement varied from 0.56 to 0.88; intraobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect. Ann Arbor stage interobserver agreement varied from 0.57 to 0.69; intraobserver agreement was substantial.
Computed tomography observer agreement in staging malignant lymphoma appears to be suboptimal. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0363-8715 1532-3145 |
DOI: | 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000338 |