Insulin pump use compared with intravenous insulin during labour and delivery: the INSPIRED observational cohort study

Aims To assess the safety and efficacy of pump therapy (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; CSII) during labour and delivery in women with Type 1 diabetes. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 161 consecutive Type 1 diabetic pregnancies delivered during 2000–2010 at Mount Sinai Hospital, To...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetic medicine 2016-09, Vol.33 (9), p.1253-1259
Hauptverfasser: Drever, E., Tomlinson, G., Bai, A. D., Feig, D. S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims To assess the safety and efficacy of pump therapy (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; CSII) during labour and delivery in women with Type 1 diabetes. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 161 consecutive Type 1 diabetic pregnancies delivered during 2000–2010 at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada. Capillary blood glucose levels during labour and delivery and time in/out of target (target: 4–6 mmol/l) were compared along with neonatal outcomes for three groups: (1) women on pumps who stayed on pumps during labour (pump/pump n = 31), (2) women on pumps who switched to intravenous (IV) insulin infusion during labour (pump/IVn = 25), and (3) women on multiple daily injections who switched to IV insulin infusion during labour (MDIn = 105). Results There were no significant differences between the mean or median glucose values during labour and delivery across all three groups, and no significant difference in time spent hypoglycaemic. However, women in the pump/pump group had significantly better glycaemic control as defined by mean glucose (5.5 vs. 6.4 mmol/l; P = 0.01), median glucose (5.4 vs. 6.3 mmol/l; P = 0.02), and more time spent in target (60.9% vs. 39.2%; P = 0.06) compared with women in the pump/IV group (after removing one outlier). Conclusions This study demonstrates that the continuation of CSII therapy during labour and delivery appears safe and efficacious. Moreover, women who choose to continue CSII have better glucose control during delivery than those who switch to IV insulin, suggesting that it should be standard practice to allow women the option of continuing CSII during labour and delivery. What's new? An increasing number of women are using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy (CSII) during their pregnancy, however, there are few data on the safety and efficacy of continuing this therapy during labour and delivery. This is the first study to compare the use of CSII with an intravenous insulin infusion during labour and delivery. This study demonstrates that the continuation of CSII in the labour and delivery period appears safe and efficacious, with similar glycaemic control in the CSII group compared with women using insulin infusion therapy during labour, with no serious adverse events. Moreover, women who choose to continue CSII during labour have better glucose control than those that choose to switch from CSII to intravenous insulin infusion, suggesting that it should be standard practice to allow women t
ISSN:0742-3071
1464-5491
DOI:10.1111/dme.13106