Differential treatment effects of two anchorage systems for rapid maxillary expansion: a retrospective cephalometric study
Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare cephalometric changes resulting from treatment with two appliances for rapid maxillary expansion: (1) a strictly tooth-borne appliance and (2) a combined tooth- and bone-borne appliance. Patients and methods Pre- and posttreatment lateral cephalogr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orofacial orthopedics 2016-09, Vol.77 (5), p.314-324 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
The purpose of this study was to compare cephalometric changes resulting from treatment with two appliances for rapid maxillary expansion: (1) a strictly tooth-borne appliance and (2) a combined tooth- and bone-borne appliance.
Patients and methods
Pre- and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 100 patients were analyzed by cephalometry. Of these patients, 50 were treated with strictly tooth-borne and another 50 with combined tooth- and bone-borne appliances. Mean pretreatment age was 13.04 ± 4.82 years, and mean treatment duration was 7.12 ± 2.37 months. To identify any implications for clinical therapy, additional subgroups were formed based on the pretreatment cephalometric findings for skeletal Class I (0° |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1434-5293 1615-6714 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00056-016-0037-1 |