Discrepancies between selected Pareto optimal plans and final deliverable plans in radiotherapy multi-criteria optimization

Abstract Multi-criteria optimization provides decision makers with a range of clinical choices through Pareto plans that can be explored during real time navigation and then converted into deliverable plans. Our study shows that dosimetric differences can arise between the two steps, which could com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Radiotherapy and oncology 2016-08, Vol.120 (2), p.346-348
Hauptverfasser:	Kyroudi, Archonteia, Petersson, Kristoffer, Ghandour, Sarah, Pachoud, Marc, Matzinger, Oscar, Ozsahin, Mahmut, Bourhis, Jean, Bochud, François, Moeckli, Raphaël
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy Deliverable Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy Male Multi-criteria optimization Navigated Pareto fronts Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy Radiometry Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated Retrospective Studies
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Abstract Multi-criteria optimization provides decision makers with a range of clinical choices through Pareto plans that can be explored during real time navigation and then converted into deliverable plans. Our study shows that dosimetric differences can arise between the two steps, which could compromise the clinical choices made during navigation.
ISSN:	0167-8140 1879-0887
DOI:	10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.018