Transtracheal jet ventilation in the ‘can’t intubate can’t oxygenate’ emergency: a systematic review

Transtracheal jet ventilation (TTJV) is recommended in several airway guidelines as a potentially life-saving procedure during the ‘Can’t Intubate Can’t Oxygenate’ (CICO) emergency. Some studies have questioned its effectiveness. Our goal was to determine the complication rates of TTJV in the CICO e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2016-09, Vol.117 (suppl_1), p.i28-i38
Hauptverfasser: Duggan, L.V., Ballantyne Scott, B., Law, J.A., Morris, I.R., Murphy, M.F., Griesdale, D.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Transtracheal jet ventilation (TTJV) is recommended in several airway guidelines as a potentially life-saving procedure during the ‘Can’t Intubate Can’t Oxygenate’ (CICO) emergency. Some studies have questioned its effectiveness. Our goal was to determine the complication rates of TTJV in the CICO emergency compared with the emergency setting where CICO is not described (non-CICO emergency) or elective surgical setting. Several databases of published and unpublished literature were searched systematically for studies describing TTJV in human subjects. Complications were categorized as device failure, barotrauma (including subcutaneous emphysema), and miscellaneous. Device failure was defined by the inability to place and/or use the TTJV device, not patient survival. Forty-four studies (428 procedures) met the inclusion criteria. Four studies included both emergency and elective procedures. Thirty studies described 132 emergency TTJV procedures; 90 were CICO emergencies. Eighteen studies described 296 elective TTJV procedures. Device failure occurred in 42% of CICO emergency vs 0% of non-CICO emergency (P
ISSN:0007-0912
1471-6771
DOI:10.1093/bja/aew192