Implementing the Prospective Surveillance Model (PSM) of Rehabilitation for Breast Cancer Patients with 1-Year Postoperative Follow-up, a Prospective, Observational Study

Background The Prospective Surveillance Model (PSM) of rehabilitation for patients with breast cancer aims for early identification, treatment, and support of physical impairments postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence of impairments during the first postoperative y...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2016-10, Vol.23 (10), p.3379-3384
Hauptverfasser: Lai, Lisa, Binkley, Jill, Jones, Veronica, Kirkpatrick, Stephanie, Furbish, Cathy, Stratford, Paul, Thompson, Winifred, Sidhu, Amanjyot, Farley, Clara, Okoli, Joel, Beech, Derrick, Gabram, Sheryl
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The Prospective Surveillance Model (PSM) of rehabilitation for patients with breast cancer aims for early identification, treatment, and support of physical impairments postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence of impairments during the first postoperative year and the differences between the patients requiring rehabilitation intervention versus those not requiring intervention. Methods A total of 120 patients were enrolled. Impairment measures included: pain, range of motion, and self-reported measures of function using the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) and Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires. These measures were performed at designated intervals during the first postoperative year. All patients received exercise and education, and patients with identified impairments underwent individualized rehabilitation intervention. Clinical factors associated with need for intervention were determined using univariate analysis. Results Thirty-six patients required rehabilitation intervention. There were no statistically significant differences between intervention and no-intervention groups for body mass index, breast surgery type, reconstruction type, or radiotherapy. Statistically significant differences were found between intervention and no-intervention groups in early postoperative UEFI, QuickDASH, pain scores, age, number of lymph nodes removed [9.3 (intervention) vs. 5.6 (no-intervention)], axillary surgery type, chemotherapy, and breast cancer stage. Conclusions Survivorship practitioners should have heightened awareness for rehabilitation intervention in patients with greater axillary surgery and burden of disease. Patients with more activity restriction and lower levels of function in the early postoperative period may benefit from rehabilitation intervention. Future studies should focus on implementing a screening tool to identify patients in need of rehabilitation referral.
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-016-5315-z