Update on current evaluation and management of pediatric nasal dermoid

Objectives/Hypothesis To review the presentation of congenital pediatric nasal dermoid and present guidelines for its evaluation and management. Study Design Retrospective chart review from 1970 to 2014 at a tertiary referral children's hospital. Methods The medical records of all patients diag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2016-09, Vol.126 (9), p.2151-2160
Hauptverfasser: Herrington, Heather, Adil, Eelam, Moritz, Ethan, Robson, Caroline, Perez-Atayde, Antonio, Proctor, Mark, Rahbar, Reza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives/Hypothesis To review the presentation of congenital pediatric nasal dermoid and present guidelines for its evaluation and management. Study Design Retrospective chart review from 1970 to 2014 at a tertiary referral children's hospital. Methods The medical records of all patients diagnosed with a nasal dermoid during the study period were reviewed for demographics, lesion characteristics, imaging, operative details, and outcomes. Results Ninety‐six patients underwent excision of a congenital nasal dermoid during the study period. The mean age at presentation was 3.1 years (range, 0.1–19.3 years). Thirty‐four (35%) females and 62 (65%) males were included. The most common presentation was a nasal dorsal mass in 66 (69%) patients. Ninety‐two (96%) of the patients underwent preoperative imaging. Seventy‐eight (82%) of the patients did not show any clinical or radiographic evidence of intracranial extension preoperatively. Eighty‐five (89%) of the patients underwent extracranial excision, and 11 (11%) underwent combined intracranial and extracranial excision. Eight patients (8%) presented with recurrence, on average 3.3 years (range, 1–6 years) after initial excision. Mean follow‐up time was 8 years (range, 1–18 years). Conclusion Preoperative imaging of nasal dermoid is crucial to evaluate for intracranial extension, thus facilitating complete removal. Thin section, high‐resolution magnetic resonance with contrast provides excellent detail of the extent of the nasal dermoid including intracranial extension. Thin‐section high‐resolution computed tomography with multiplanar reformatted images provides complimentary information regarding the bone anatomy of the frontonasal region. Surgical strategy is dictated by preoperative imaging and is dependent on the extent of the lesion, but limited facial incisions are preferred. Level of Evidence 4. Laryngoscope, 126:2151–2160, 2016
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.25860