Independent radiologic review of AURELIA, a phase 3 trial of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer
Abstract Objective The randomized, open-label, phase 3 Avastin® Use in Platinum-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (AURELIA) trial achieved its primary efficacy end point of significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gynecologic oncology 2016-09, Vol.142 (3), p.465-470 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Objective The randomized, open-label, phase 3 Avastin® Use in Platinum-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (AURELIA) trial achieved its primary efficacy end point of significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy (CT) compared with CT alone for platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer. Primary analyses were conducted via investigator assessment of PFS; to confirm primary results, an independent review committee (IRC) retrospectively assessed radiographic data. Methods Per an amendment to the original study protocol, the IRC reviewed radiographic data from 298 (82.5%) patients in a blinded manner using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified version 1.0). IRC-assessed PFS and concordance between the two assessments were evaluated. Results IRC assessment demonstrated that PFS was significantly prolonged for patients treated with CT + bevacizumab compared with CT alone (median, 8.1 vs. 3.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.484; 95% confidence interval, 0.370–0.632; P < 0.0001). Results were similar to the primary PFS analysis from investigator assessment (median, 6.8 vs. 3.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.384; 95% confidence interval, 0.300–0.491; P < 0.0001). Concordance rates for progressive disease status (CT + bevacizumab, 68.2%; CT, 69.9%) and date (CT + bevacizumab, 67.2%; CT, 69.1%) were similar across treatment arms. Among 161 IRC-evaluable patients declared to have progressive disease by investigator and IRC assessment, 68.3% progressed on the same date as determined by both investigator and IRC. Conclusions IRC assessment of PFS confirmed the investigator-assessed PFS improvement for patients treated with CT + bevacizumab compared with CT alone in the AURELIA study. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-8258 1095-6859 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.05.011 |