Validation of a single-stage fixed-rate step test for the prediction of maximal oxygen uptake in healthy adults

Summary Healthcare professionals with limited access to ergospirometry remain in need of valid and simple submaximal exercise tests to predict maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). Despite previous validation studies concerning fixed‐rate step tests, accurate equations for the estimation of VO2max remain...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical physiology and functional imaging 2016-09, Vol.36 (5), p.401-406
Hauptverfasser: Hansen, Dominique, Jacobs, Nele, Thijs, Herbert, Dendale, Paul, Claes, Neree
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Healthcare professionals with limited access to ergospirometry remain in need of valid and simple submaximal exercise tests to predict maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). Despite previous validation studies concerning fixed‐rate step tests, accurate equations for the estimation of VO2max remain to be formulated from a large sample of healthy adults between age 18–75 years (n > 100). The aim of this study was to develop a valid equation to estimate VO2max from a fixed‐rate step test in a larger sample of healthy adults. A maximal ergospirometry test, with assessment of cardiopulmonary parameters and VO2max, and a 5‐min fixed‐rate single‐stage step test were executed in 112 healthy adults (age 18–75 years). During the step test and subsequent recovery, heart rate was monitored continuously. By linear regression analysis, an equation to predict VO2max from the step test was formulated. This equation was assessed for level of agreement by displaying Bland–Altman plots and calculation of intraclass correlations with measured VO2max. Validity further was assessed by employing a Jackknife procedure. The linear regression analysis generated the following equation to predict VO2max (l min−1) from the step test: 0·054(BMI)+0·612(gender)+3·359(body height in m)+0·019(fitness index)−0·012(HRmax)−0·011(age)−3·475. This equation explained 78% of the variance in measured VO2max (F = 66·15, P
ISSN:1475-0961
1475-097X
DOI:10.1111/cpf.12243