Small-vessel treatment with contemporary newer-generation drug-eluting coronary stents in all-comers: Insights from 2-year DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) randomized trial
Treatment of lesions in small vessels was associated with worse clinical outcome, and various definitions of “small vessels” have been used. Data with novel drug-eluting stents are scarce. To compare the outcome of patients with vs without small-vessel treatment, we assessed 2-year follow-up data of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American heart journal 2016-06, Vol.176, p.28-35 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Treatment of lesions in small vessels was associated with worse clinical outcome, and various definitions of “small vessels” have been used. Data with novel drug-eluting stents are scarce.
To compare the outcome of patients with vs without small-vessel treatment, we assessed 2-year follow-up data of the DUTCH PEERS randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01331707), in which 1,811 all-comers were treated with contemporary zotarolimus-eluting (Resolute Integrity) or everolimus-eluting (Promus Element) stents. Primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.
The rates of TLF (9.5% vs 5.4%; P log rank = .001) and 2 individual components thereof—target vessel myocardial infarction (3.1% vs 1.3%; P log rank = .006) and target lesion revascularization (4.8% vs 2.8%; P log rank = .02)—were higher among 798 (44.1%) patients treated in at least one small vessel ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-8703 1097-6744 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.02.020 |