Reconsolidation-induced memory persistence: Participation of late phase hippocampal ERK activation
•Weak and strong IA memory retrieval induce differential hippocampal ERK1/2 activity.•Post-retrieval dHIP ERK2 inhibition impairs memory reconsolidation tested at 24h.•dHIP ERK inhibition 3h after retrieval impairs persistent-LTM at 7days.•dHIP ERK inhibition effect on persistent-LTM is retrieval-de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurobiology of learning and memory 2016-09, Vol.133, p.79-88 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Weak and strong IA memory retrieval induce differential hippocampal ERK1/2 activity.•Post-retrieval dHIP ERK2 inhibition impairs memory reconsolidation tested at 24h.•dHIP ERK inhibition 3h after retrieval impairs persistent-LTM at 7days.•dHIP ERK inhibition effect on persistent-LTM is retrieval-dependent/retrieval-induced.
Persistence is an attribute of long-term memories (LTM) that has recently caught researcher’s attention in search for mechanisms triggered by experience that assure memory perdurability. Up-to-date, scarce evidence of relationship between reconsolidation and persistence has been described. Here, we characterized hippocampal ERK participation in LTM reconsolidation and persistence using an inhibitory avoidance task (IA) at different time points. Intra-dorsal-hippocampal (dHIP) administration of an ERK inhibitor (PD098059, PD, 1.0μg/hippocampus) 3h after retrieval did not affect reconsolidation of a strong IA, when tested 24h apart. However, the same manipulation impaired performance when animals were tested at 7d, regardless of the training’s strength; and being specific to memory reactivation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing that persistence might be triggered after memory reactivation involving an ERK/MAPK-dependent process. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1074-7427 1095-9564 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.06.013 |