Transport of carbon dioxide, water vapor, and ozone by turbulence and local circulations

Nocturnal land breezes and daytime lake breezes are studied using data collected by the Canadian Twin Otter aircraft and a deck boat which traversed Candle Lake during the Boreal Ecosystem‐Atmosphere Study (BOREAS). The nocturnal vertical transport of CO2, water vapor, and ozone over the lake consis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC Washington, DC, 1998-10, Vol.103 (D20), p.25873-25885
Hauptverfasser: Sun, Jielun, Desjardins, Raymond, Mahrt, Larry, MacPherson, Ian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Nocturnal land breezes and daytime lake breezes are studied using data collected by the Canadian Twin Otter aircraft and a deck boat which traversed Candle Lake during the Boreal Ecosystem‐Atmosphere Study (BOREAS). The nocturnal vertical transport of CO2, water vapor, and ozone over the lake consists of two parts: (1) mesoscale rising motion associated with land breeze convergence and (2) significant turbulence and vertical mixing driven by buoyancy in the lower part of the internal boundary layer and shear generation in the top part of the internal boundary layer. For comparison, the role of the lake in the daytime is examined in terms of formation of a stable internal boundary layer due to advection of warm air from land with small CO2 concentration over the cooler lake surface. Analysis of the aircraft and boat data indicates that the nocturnal land breeze plays an important role in the regional CO2 budget in the lake region. In the present study, CO2 is advected horizontally by a nocturnal land breeze circulation and vented vertically over Candle Lake (“chimney effect”). Such near‐surface horizontal transport implies that part of the respirated CO2 never reaches the tower observational level, particularly under light wind conditions. This study speculates that preferred locations of vertical venting of CO2 may also occur due to convergence of nocturnal drainage circulations or flow meandering, although probably weaker than that associated with the land breeze. These circulations partly explain recent findings that tower‐measured nocturnal turbulent fluxes of CO2 above the canopy and the subcanopy storage of CO2 frequently sum to less than the total respiration of CO2, leading to “missing CO2.” Unfortunately, the present study does not allow evaluation of all of the terms in the carbon dioxide budget.
ISSN:0148-0227
2156-2202
DOI:10.1029/98JD02439