The effect of ambient temperature and humidity on interdialytic weight gains in end-stage renal disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis

Purpose Interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) is both a measure of dietary compliance and a well-established predictor of future adverse outcomes in dialysis patients. The impact of environmental conditions on IDWG in end-stage renal disease is little studied to date. Methods We retrospectively reviewed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International urology and nephrology 2016-07, Vol.48 (7), p.1171-1176
Hauptverfasser: Tapolyai, Mihály B., Faludi, Mária, Berta, Klára, Szarvas, Tibor, Lengvárszky, Zsolt, Molnar, Miklos Z., Dossabhoy, Neville R., Fülöp, Tibor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) is both a measure of dietary compliance and a well-established predictor of future adverse outcomes in dialysis patients. The impact of environmental conditions on IDWG in end-stage renal disease is little studied to date. Methods We retrospectively reviewed IDWG for 100 consenting chronic end-stage renal disease patients undergoing thrice weekly in-center hemodiafiltration under three different climatic conditions in a Central European city: Weekend_1 was humid (93 %) and warm (24 °C); Weekend_2 was dry (38 %) and hot (33 °C); and Weekend_3 was dry (30 %) and warm (24 °C). Results The cohort’s mean age was 60.9 ± 14.7 years, all were Eastern European, and 56 % were men. Residual urine output measured 100 [25–75 % quartiles: 0, 612] mL/day, single-pool Kt / V 1.4 ± 0.25, and albumin 40.1 ± 3.9 g/L. Mean IDWGs measured as follows: Weekend_1 (“humid-warm”): 2973 ± 1386 mL; Weekend_2 (“dry-hot”): 2685 ± 1368 mL and Weekend_3 (“dry-warm”): 2926 ± 1311 mL. Paired-samples testing for difference showed higher fluid gains on the humid-warm (239 mL; 95 % CI 21–458 mL; p  = 0.032) and on the dry-warm weekends (222 mL; 95 % CI −8 to 453 mL, p  = 0.059), when compared to the dry-hot weekend. Under the latter, dry-hot climatic condition, residual urine output lost its significance to impact IDWG during multiple regression analysis. Conclusion While excess temperature may impact IDWG to a small degree, air humidity does not; the least weight gains occurred on the dry-hot weekend. However, the effects of both were minimal under continental summer conditions and are unlikely to explain large excesses of individual session-to-session variations.
ISSN:0301-1623
1573-2584
DOI:10.1007/s11255-016-1297-9