Inhibitory effects of heterotopic noxious counter-stimulation on perception and brain activity related to Aβ-fibre activation

Heterotopic noxious counter‐stimulation (HNCS) inhibits pain and pain processes through cerebral and cerebrospinal mechanisms. However, it is unclear whether HNCS inhibits non‐nociceptive processes, which needs to be clarified for a better understanding of HNCS analgesia. The aim of this study was t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The European journal of neuroscience 2016-07, Vol.44 (1), p.1771-1778
Hauptverfasser: Rustamov, Nabi, Tessier, Jessica, Provencher, Benjamin, Lehmann, Alexandre, Piché, Mathieu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Heterotopic noxious counter‐stimulation (HNCS) inhibits pain and pain processes through cerebral and cerebrospinal mechanisms. However, it is unclear whether HNCS inhibits non‐nociceptive processes, which needs to be clarified for a better understanding of HNCS analgesia. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of HNCS on perception and scalp somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). Seventeen healthy volunteers participated in two counter‐balanced sessions, including non‐nociceptive (selective Aβ‐fibre activation) or nociceptive electrical stimulation, combined with HNCS. HNCS was produced by a 20‐min cold pressor test (left hand) adjusted individually to produce moderate pain (mean ± SEM: 42.5 ± 5.3 on a 0–100 scale, where 0 is no pain and 100 the worst pain imaginable). Non‐nociceptive electrical stimulation was adjusted individually at 80% of pain threshold and produced a tactile sensation in every subject. Nociceptive electrical stimulation was adjusted individually at 120% of RIII‐reflex threshold and produced moderate pain (45.3 ± 4.5). Shock sensation was significantly decreased by HNCS compared with baseline for non‐nociceptive (P 
ISSN:0953-816X
1460-9568
DOI:10.1111/ejn.13258