Early versus late surgical intervention or medical management for infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveInfective endocarditis is associated with high morbidity and mortality and optimal timing for surgical intervention is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare early surgical intervention with conservative therapy in patients with infective endocarditis.Methods...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2016-06, Vol.102 (12), p.950-957
Hauptverfasser: Anantha Narayanan, Mahesh, Mahfood Haddad, Toufik, Kalil, Andre C, Kanmanthareddy, Arun, Suri, Rakesh M, Mansour, George, Destache, Christopher J, Baskaran, Janani, Mooss, Aryan N, Wichman, Tammy, Morrow, Lee, Vivekanandan, Renuga
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectiveInfective endocarditis is associated with high morbidity and mortality and optimal timing for surgical intervention is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare early surgical intervention with conservative therapy in patients with infective endocarditis.MethodsPubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, CINAHL and Google-scholar databases were searched from January 1960 to April 2015. Randomised controlled trials, retrospective cohorts and prospective observational studies comparing outcomes between early surgery at 20 days or less and conservative management for infective endocarditis were analysed.ResultsA total of 21 studies were included. OR of all-cause mortality for early surgery was 0.61 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.74, p
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308589