Analysis of workers' compensation claims data for machine-related injuries in metal fabrication businesses
Background Metal fabrication workers are at high risk for machine‐related injury. Apart from amputations, data on factors contributing to this problem are generally absent. Methods Narrative text analysis was performed on workers' compensation claims in order to identify machine‐related injurie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of industrial medicine 2016-08, Vol.59 (8), p.656-664 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Metal fabrication workers are at high risk for machine‐related injury. Apart from amputations, data on factors contributing to this problem are generally absent.
Methods
Narrative text analysis was performed on workers' compensation claims in order to identify machine‐related injuries and determine work tasks involved. Data were further evaluated on the basis of cost per claim, nature of injury, and part of body.
Results
From an initial set of 4,268 claims, 1,053 were classified as machine‐related. Frequently identified tasks included machine operation (31%), workpiece handling (20%), setup/adjustment (15%), and removing chips (12%). Lacerations to finger(s), hand, or thumb comprised 38% of machine‐related injuries; foreign body in the eye accounted for 20%. Amputations were relatively rare but had highest costs per claim (mean $21,059; median $11,998).
Conclusions
Despite limitations, workers' compensation data were useful in characterizing machine‐related injuries. Improving the quality of data collected by insurers would enhance occupational injury surveillance and prevention efforts. Am. J. Ind. Med. 59:656–664, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0271-3586 1097-0274 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ajim.22603 |