Oxidative removal of phenol by HRP-immobilized beads and its environmental toxicology assessment
Horseradish peroxidase shows potential biological and environmental applications on the removal of phenolic compounds. In the present study, the HRP-immobilized beads were synthesized to detect the efficiency of the removal of phenol at optimum pH and H2O2 concentration. Comparative in vitro cytotox...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 2016-08, Vol.130, p.234-239 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Horseradish peroxidase shows potential biological and environmental applications on the removal of phenolic compounds. In the present study, the HRP-immobilized beads were synthesized to detect the efficiency of the removal of phenol at optimum pH and H2O2 concentration. Comparative in vitro cytotoxicity of phenol/treated solutions were evaluated in HeLa, HepG2 and mcf-7 cells by using MTT method along with flow cytometry study for cell viability and cell cycle distributions. The results showed that the toxicity of phenol solutions were greatly reduced after treated by HRP-immobilized beads, and phenol could lead to deactivate of cells in the S phase and preventing them from going into the G2/M checkpoint. In addition, molecular docking study showed that phenol was a valid inhibitor for the cyclin E in the cell cycle and cell metabolism. Thereby, we established a suitable strategy with promising application for efficient harmless removal of phenol, which significantly decreased the cytotoxic impacts of phenol.
[Display omitted]
•The immobilized beads were successfully used for efficient removal of phenol.•The toxicity of treated phenol solutions were greatly reduced by using MTT methods.•The toxicity action of phenol was explored by flow cytometry and molecular docking. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0147-6513 1090-2414 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.04.022 |