Interobserver Agreement Between Pathologists Assessing Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) in Breast Cancer Using Methodology Proposed by the International TILs Working Group

ABSTRACT Background The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast tumors is prognostic and predictive, suggesting that TILs may be an important biomarker. Recently, an international TILs working group formulated consensus recommendations for TIL evaluation. The current study was pe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2016-07, Vol.23 (7), p.2242-2248
Hauptverfasser: Swisher, Shannon K., Wu, Yun, Castaneda, Carlos A., Lyons, Genvieve R., Yang, Fei, Tapia, Coya, Wang, Xiuhong, Casavilca, Sandro A. A., Bassett, Roland, Castillo, Miluska, Sahin, Aysegul, Mittendorf, Elizabeth A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Background The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast tumors is prognostic and predictive, suggesting that TILs may be an important biomarker. Recently, an international TILs working group formulated consensus recommendations for TIL evaluation. The current study was performed to determine interobserver agreement using that methodology. Methods Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were assessed on a single hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slide obtained from the core biopsy of 75 triple-negative breast cancers. Four pathologists independently reviewed each slide and evaluated stromal TILs (sTILs) and intratumoral TIL (iTILs). The kappa statistic was used to estimate interobserver agreement for identification of sTILs, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate the agreement among observers for iTILs. Cases with poor agreement were reviewed to identify pathologic factors that may contribute to the lack of agreement. Results The kappa statistic for sTIL evaluation was 0.57 (standard error, 0.04). For iTILs, the ICC calculated to determine internal consistency within raters was 0.65 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.56–0.74; p  
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-016-5173-8