Chronic pacing and adverse outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

ObjectiveMany patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have a pre-existing, permanent pacemaker (PPM) or receive one as a consequence of the procedure. We hypothesised that chronic pacing may have adverse effects on TAVI outcomes.Methods and resultsFour groups of patients u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2015-10, Vol.101 (20), p.1665-1671
Hauptverfasser: Dizon, Jose’ M, Nazif, Tamim M, Hess, Paul L, Biviano, Angelo, Garan, Hasan, Douglas, Pamela S, Kapadia, Samir, Babaliaros, Vasilis, Herrmann, Howard C, Szeto, Wilson Y, Jilaihawi, Hasan, Fearon, William F, Tuzcu, E Murat, Pichard, Augusto D, Makkar, Raj, Williams, Mathew, Hahn, Rebecca T, Xu, Ke, Smith, Craig R, Leon, Martin B, Kodali, Susheel K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectiveMany patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have a pre-existing, permanent pacemaker (PPM) or receive one as a consequence of the procedure. We hypothesised that chronic pacing may have adverse effects on TAVI outcomes.Methods and resultsFour groups of patients undergoing TAVI in the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial and registries were compared: prior PPM (n=586), new PPM (n=173), no PPM (n=1612), and left bundle branch block (LBBB)/no PPM (n=160). At 1 year, prior PPM, new PPM and LBBB/no PPM had higher all-cause mortality than no PPM (27.4%, 26.3%, 27.7% and 20.0%, p
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307666