PO-0728Lung Lavage With Dilute Porcine Surfactant For Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Randomised Controlled Study, A Preliminary Report

Background and aimsMeconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) is an important cause of severe respiratory failure in newborn infants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lung lavage with dilute porcine surfactant in ventilated infants with MAS.MethodsIn this prospective randomised controll...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of disease in childhood 2014-10, Vol.99 (Suppl 2), p.A493-A494
Hauptverfasser: Arayici, S, Sari, F N, Kadioglu Simsek, G, Yarci, E, Canpolat, F E, Oguz, S S, Uras, N, Dilmen, U
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and aimsMeconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) is an important cause of severe respiratory failure in newborn infants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lung lavage with dilute porcine surfactant in ventilated infants with MAS.MethodsIn this prospective randomised controlled study ventilated infants with MAS with a gestational age greater than or equal to 36, birth weight greater than or equal to 2000 g included. Enrolled infants randomised into two groups; in group 1, two sequential 15 mL/kg aliquots of dilute porcine surfactant (Curosurf, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p. A., Parma, Italy) with a phospholipid concentration of 5 mg/ml were instilled into the lung. In group 2, 100 mg/kg of porcine surfactant were administered as a bolus. Infants in both groups were evaluated and compared with regard to efficacy, morbidity and mortality.ResultsFourteen infants were randomised. There were no significant differences between two groups in term of demographic characteristics. Median duration of respiratory support was longer in bolus surfactant group, although the difference was not statistically significant (2.2 vs. 7.2 days, p = 0.18). Similarly, duration of oxygen therapy and hospital stay length were shorter in lung lavage group but the difference was statistically insignificant (8.0 vs. 12.7 days, p = 0.32, 11 vs. 18.5 days p = 0.15, respectively). There were no differences in requirement for high frequency ventilation and nitric oxide between the groups.ConclusionAlthough it is not statistically significant, preliminary results show that lung lavage with dilute surfactant therapy shortens the duration of respiratory support and hospital stay length.
ISSN:0003-9888
DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.1368