Comparison between visual grading and planimetric quantification of microvascular obstruction extent assessment in reperfused acute myocardial infarction
Objectives Current methods for infarct size and microvascular obstruction (MVO) quantification by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging rely on planimetry. This method is time-consuming. We sought to evaluate a direct assessment of MVO severity based on visual evaluation and to compare it to a re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European radiology 2016-07, Vol.26 (7), p.2166-2175 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
Current methods for infarct size and microvascular obstruction (MVO) quantification by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging rely on planimetry. This method is time-consuming. We sought to evaluate a direct assessment of MVO severity based on visual evaluation and to compare it to a reference method.
Methods
CMR was performed in 112 consecutive patients after reperfused myocardial infarction. MVO was estimated by direct visual assessment based on a three-grade severity scale (MVO 1, mild; MVO 2, moderate; MVO 3, severe) on late gadolinium-enhancement (LGE).
Results
MVO was present in 69 patients (61.6 %). Quantitative MVO extent significantly increased accordingly to visual MVO grading (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00330-015-4069-5 |