Respiratory gating algorithm helps to reconstruct more accurate electroanatomical maps during atrial fibrillation ablation performed under spontaneous respiration

Purpose Electroanatomical mapping is a useful tool during the ablation of atrial fibrillation. Respiratory movement might influence the mapping accuracy and merging. This study aims to investigate the effect of respiratory gating on the accuracy of magnetic-field-based electroanatomical mapping unde...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology 2016-08, Vol.46 (2), p.153-159
Hauptverfasser: Széplaki, Gábor, Gellér, László, Özcan, Emin Evren, Tahin, Tamás, Kovács, Orsolya Mária, Parázs, Nóra, Karády, Júlia, Maurovich-Horvat, Pál, Szilágyi, Szabolcs, Osztheimer, István, Tóth, Attila, Merkely, Béla
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Electroanatomical mapping is a useful tool during the ablation of atrial fibrillation. Respiratory movement might influence the mapping accuracy and merging. This study aims to investigate the effect of respiratory gating on the accuracy of magnetic-field-based electroanatomical mapping under spontaneous respiration. Methods Fifty-one consecutive patients (35 male, aged 30–78 years) who underwent left atrial radiofrequency catheter ablation due to atrial fibrillation were included. Electroanatomical mapping was performed with CARTO 3 System under conscious sedation. Respiratory gating was achieved with the AccuResp algorithm (Biosense Webster). Average surface match and maximum distance of the pre-acquired and electroanatomical maps, as well as left atrial volume, were recorded with and without respiratory gating after merging. Results The average surface match of the electroanatomical map with the left atrial reconstruction was significantly better with respiratory gating than without using the algorithm (3.81 ± 1.09 vs 4.11 ± 1.61 mm, p  = 0.0119). It was not dependent of the rhythm during mapping or the image modality used for left atrial reconstruction. The maximal distance between the two maps did not depend on the use of the algorithm (19.81 ± 6.24 mm for gated and 20.87 ± 7.99 mm for non-gated, p  = 0.3161). Left atrial volume of the map was significantly lower when using the respiratory compensation module (106.3 ± 31.6 vs 127.0 ± 36.4 ml, p  
ISSN:1383-875X
1572-8595
DOI:10.1007/s10840-016-0105-x