NI-62 DCE-MRI DISCRIMINATES BETWEEN RESPONDER AND NON-RESPONDER IN PROGRESSIVE HIGH GRADE GLIOMA PATIENTS UNDERGOING ANTI-ANGIOGENIC TREATMENT

OBJECTIVES: In this prospective phase II clinical study we analyzed whether dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) - MRI may distinguish between anti-vascular and anti-tumor effects in the course of anti-angiogenic treatment of progressive high-grade glioma patients (pHGG). METHODS: Twenty-two patients wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2014-11, Vol.16 (suppl 5), p.v152-v152
Hauptverfasser: Nowosielski, M., Kremser, C., Schocke, M., Gizewski, E., Iglseder, S., Muigg, A., Freyschlag, C., Stockhammer, G., Hutterer, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVES: In this prospective phase II clinical study we analyzed whether dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) - MRI may distinguish between anti-vascular and anti-tumor effects in the course of anti-angiogenic treatment of progressive high-grade glioma patients (pHGG). METHODS: Twenty-two patients with pHGG (16 glioblastoma, 5 anaplastic astrocytoma WHO III, 1 anaplastic oligoastrocytoma) were treated biweekly with bevacizumab/irinotecan. DCE-MRI scans were performed at baseline and eight weeks after treatment commencement. DCE-MRI analysis included four semiquantitative parameters, describing gadolinium contrast medium behavior; 1) initial slope of signal increase (marker for vessel permeability; slope), 2) maximum enhancement (marker for extravascular volume; ME), 3) time from starting of curve increase until ME (time-to-peak; TTP), 4) area under the curve until ME (IAUC). Responders to anti-angiogenic therapy were defined as having a progression free survival (PFS) greater than six months (PFS6). DCE-MRI parameters were compared to PFS6 by Wilcoxon rank test. RESULTS: Mean PFS was 4.0 plus or minus 2.2 months and 4 patients showed a PFS greater than 6 months and were classified as responders. At baseline there was no difference in ME, TTP, IAUC and slope between responder and non-respopnder. At follow-up responders showed a significant decrease in ME, TTP and IAUC, whereas slope did not change (mean ME 60.03% vs. 23.0%, mean TTP 579.5sec vs 367.4sec, mean IAUC 55040 vs 12150 and slope 1.03 vs 1.04, p < 0.001). In contrary non-responder did not show a change in ME, TTP and IAUC but an increase in slope (mean ME 55.45% vs 50.21%, mean sTTP 539.0sec vs 523.4sec, mean IAUC 53440 vs 50320 and slope 1.49 vs 1.74, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: By semiquantitative DCE-MRI analysis we could show that responders to anti-angiogenic therapy show a significant decrease in extravascular volume despite no decrease in vascular permeability. These results might provide insights into anti-angiogenic treatment effects in responding patients.
ISSN:1522-8517
1523-5866
DOI:10.1093/neuonc/nou264.60