Debridement with prosthesis retention and antibiotherapy vs. two-stage revision for periprosthetic knee infection within 3 months after arthroplasty: a case-control study: Infectious diseases
Sixty-four patients with periprosthetic infection within 3 months of index arthroplasty, of whom 39 underwent debridement with prosthesis retention and antibiotherapy (DPRA), and 25 underwent two-stage revision (2SR), were compared regarding control of infection and functional outcomes by use of Kne...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical microbiology and infection 2015-09, Vol.21 (9), p.851.e11-851.e17 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Sixty-four patients with periprosthetic infection within 3 months of index arthroplasty, of whom 39 underwent debridement with prosthesis retention and antibiotherapy (DPRA), and 25 underwent two-stage revision (2SR), were compared regarding control of infection and functional outcomes by use of Knee Society scores. Failure was defined as the need for subsequent surgery to control infection. The failure rate after DPRA was 61.5%, and that after 2SR was 12.0% (p 0.001). The failure risk was not significantly associated with the duration of symptoms ( less than or equal to 4 weeks). The only predictor of failure was isolation of Staphylococcus aureus or Staphylococcus epidermidis. Treatment with 2SR required fewer surgical operations, a shorter duration of hospitalization, and a shorter duration of treatment. All patients who required a second debridement ultimately underwent prosthesis removal. The functional outcome was significantly better for 2SR at the last follow-up. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1198-743X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.05.028 |