The Utility of Preemptive Distal Perfusion Cannulation During Peripheral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support

Objectives We compared the ischemia and rescue rates according to the strategy of distal cannulation. Background Limb ischemia developing during percutaneous venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a potentially severe complication. Although appropriate use of a distal perfus...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of interventional cardiology 2016-08, Vol.29 (4), p.431-436
Hauptverfasser: Yeo, Hye Ju, Yoon, Seong Hoon, Jeon, Doosoo, Kim, Yun Seong, Cho, Woo Hyun, Kim, Dohyung, Lee, Seung Eun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives We compared the ischemia and rescue rates according to the strategy of distal cannulation. Background Limb ischemia developing during percutaneous venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a potentially severe complication. Although appropriate use of a distal perfusion cannula can avoid ischemia, evidences about distal cannulation is still lacking. Methods Patients who underwent peripheral VA ECMO between January 2010 and August 2015 were reviewed. We classified patients into 2 groups in terms of insertion timing with respect to the onset of ischemia. The preemptive strategy group underwent early insertion of a distal perfusion cannula at commencement of ECMO support. The rescue strategy group underwent delayed cannula insertion after onset of limb ischemia. Results A total of 151 patients were included in the analysis. Forty‐four patients formed the preemptive strategy group and 107 patients formed the rescue strategy group. In total, 10 of 151 (6.7%) patients developed significant limb ischemia, they all were the rescue strategy group (10/107, 9.3%). Of the 10 patients, 2 patients were rescued from limb ischemia after distal cannulation. Otherwise, ischemia was not rescued in the remaining eight patients. Of the latter 8, 3 patient required surgical interventions (2 fasciotomy and 1 below‐the‐knee amputation) and the other five died from disease aggravation prior to surgical intervention. Conclusions Preemptive distal perfusion cannulation is safe and effective when used to prevent lower limb ischemia in patients undergoing femoral cannulation to treat ECMO. However, delayed distal cannulation increases the extent of cannulation site bleeding, without improving the ischemia.
ISSN:0896-4327
1540-8183
DOI:10.1111/joic.12309