How do online course design features influence student performance?
Given the rapid growth in online coursework within higher education, it is important to establish and validate quality standards for these courses. While many online learning quality rubrics do exist, thus far there has been little empirical evidence establishing a clear link between specific course...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computers and education 2016-04, Vol.95, p.270-284 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Given the rapid growth in online coursework within higher education, it is important to establish and validate quality standards for these courses. While many online learning quality rubrics do exist, thus far there has been little empirical evidence establishing a clear link between specific course design features and concrete, student-level course outcomes. In the current study, the authors develop an online course design assessment rubric that includes four areas, and explore the impact of each area on student end-of-semester performance in 23 online courses at two community colleges. The results indicate that the quality of interpersonal interaction within a course relates positively and significantly to student grades. Additional analyses based on course observation and interview data suggest that frequent and effective student–instructor interaction creates an online environment that encourages students to commit themselves to the course and perform at a stronger academic level.
•A new online design assessment rubric is developed.•The relationship between four online course design features and student course grades is examined.•Quality of online interpersonal interaction relates positively to student grades.•Typical practices of online courses with high- versus low-quality interpersonal interaction are showcased.•Potential strategies to improve online learning outcomes are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0360-1315 1873-782X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.014 |