Enhancement of impact resistance of Fe-based amorphous coating by Al2O3 dispersion
The load-bearing applications of Fe based amorphous coatings are limited due to their poor impact resistance. Here, we have designed an amorphous composite coating reinforced with 20wt% Al2O3 particles that is tougher and more impact resistant than the monolithic amorphous coating. Impact resistance...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Materials letters 2016-05, Vol.171, p.112-116 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The load-bearing applications of Fe based amorphous coatings are limited due to their poor impact resistance. Here, we have designed an amorphous composite coating reinforced with 20wt% Al2O3 particles that is tougher and more impact resistant than the monolithic amorphous coating. Impact resistance of the coatings was systematically studied by drop-weight impact tests and finite element modelling (FEM). It was found that the hard Al2O3 particles in the composite coatings could effectively hinder crack propagation via the formation of micro-cracks inside the Al2O3 particles, which absorbs the impact energy. FEM indicates that the Al2O3 dispersion acts as the main loading-bearing phase and alleviates the stress concentration in the composite coating, thus suppresses crack initiation and propagation. Furthermore, electrochemical polarization test shows that composite coating remains good corrosion resistance in a 3.5% NaCl solution after impact.
[Display omitted]
•20% Al2O3 particle addition remarkably improves the impact resistance of amorphous coating.•Al2O3 particles absorb impact energy by crack deflection and micro-crack mechanisms.•Al2O3 particles alleviate the stress concentration upon impacting revealed by FEM.•The composite coating is more corrosion resistant than the monolithic coating after impact. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-577X 1873-4979 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.02.060 |