In Vivo Performance of Fenofibrate Formulated With Ordered Mesoporous Silica Versus 2-Marketed Formulations: A Comparative Bioavailability Study in Beagle Dogs

The present study aims to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo performance of ordered mesoporous silica (OMS) as a carrier for the poorly water-soluble compound fenofibrate. Fenofibrate was loaded into OMS via incipient wetness impregnation to obtain a 29% drug load and formulated into capsules. Two ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pharmaceutical sciences 2016-08, Vol.105 (8), p.2381-2385
Hauptverfasser: Bukara, Katarina, Schueller, Laurent, Rosier, Jan, Daems, Tinne, Verheyden, Loes, Eelen, Siemon, Martens, Johan A., Van den Mooter, Guy, Bugarski, Branko, Kiekens, Filip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The present study aims to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo performance of ordered mesoporous silica (OMS) as a carrier for the poorly water-soluble compound fenofibrate. Fenofibrate was loaded into OMS via incipient wetness impregnation to obtain a 29% drug load and formulated into capsules. Two capsule dosage forms (containing 33.5 and 16.75 mg fenofibrate, respectively) were compared with the commercially available forms—Lipanthyl® (fenofibrate microcrystals) and Tricor® (fenofibrate nanocrystals). In vitro dissolution tests showed that the amount of fenofibrate released from Lipanthyl® and Tricor® was approximately 30%, whereas approximately 66% and 60% of the drug was released from OMS capsules containing 33.5 and 16.75 mg of fenofibrate, respectively. Storage of OMS capsules loaded with 33.5 mg of fenofibrate at 25°C/60% relative humidity (RH) or 40°C/75% RH did not alter the release kinetics, nor the physical state of the compound, pointing the stability of the present formulation. The in vivo study in dogs confirmed satisfying level of safety and tolerability of fenofibrate–OMS formulation (eq. 33.5 mg) with the potential to improve the absorption of fenofibrate. Though some variability in the data, this formulation is promising to be further investigated in a clinical trial setting.
ISSN:0022-3549
1520-6017
DOI:10.1016/j.xphs.2016.05.019