Predictors of non-use of prostheses by people with lower limb amputation after discharge from rehabilitation: development and validation of clinical prediction rules
Abstract Questions : Can rules be developed to predict the risk of non-use of prostheses by people with lower limb amputation following discharge from rehabilitation? Are these clinical prediction rules valid? Design : Retrospective and prospective cohort study designs. Participants : Consecutive te...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of physiotherapy 2014-12, Vol.60 (4), p.224-231 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Questions : Can rules be developed to predict the risk of non-use of prostheses by people with lower limb amputation following discharge from rehabilitation? Are these clinical prediction rules valid? Design : Retrospective and prospective cohort study designs. Participants : Consecutive tertiary rehabilitation patients: 135 retrospective (103 males, mean age = 56 years, SD 15) and 66 prospective (58 males, mean age = 54 years, SD 16). Method : Medical records were audited for potential predictor variables. Retrospective participants were interviewed at a median of 1.9 years after discharge (IQR 1.4 to 2.5) and prospective participants at a median of 1.3 years (IQR 1.1 to 1.4). Results : Clinical prediction rules were identified at 4, 8 and 12 months after discharge, and validated. Amputation levels above transtibial and mobility-aid use were common predictors for all three time frames. At 4 months, if four out of five predictor variables were present (LR+ = 43.9, 95% CI 2.73 to 999+), the probability of non-use increased from 12 to 86% ( p < 0.001). At 8 months, if all three predictor variables were present (LR+ = 33.9, 95% CI 2.1 to 999+), the probability of non-use increased from 15 to 86% ( p < 0.001). At 12 months, if two out of three predictor variables were present (LR+ = 2.8, 95% CI 0.9 to 6.6), the probability of non-use increased from 17 to 36% ( p < 0.031). Conclusions : These validated clinical prediction rules have implications for rehabilitation and service model development. [Roffman CE, Buchanan J, Allison GT (2014) Predictors of non-use of prostheses by people with lower limb amputation after discharge from rehabilitation: development and validation of clinical prediction rules. Journal of Physiotherapy 60: 224–231] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1836-9553 1836-9561 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jphys.2014.09.003 |