Comparison Between Non-invasive (Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Derived) and Invasive-Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Serial Stenoses Within One Coronary Artery: A NXT Trial substudy

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been established as gold standard to detect hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Non-invasive FFR derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA; FFR CT ) has demonstrated higher diagnostic performance compared with FFR. However, the accuracy and potential advantages of FFR CT compared with invasive FFR in coronary arteries with serial lesions have not been examined. The aim of this study was to compare trans-lesional gradient in FFR CT to that in invasive FFR in coronary arteries with serial stenoses. Eighteen vessels with serial coronary lesions from 18 stable angina patients were evaluated with angiography, FFR, and coronary CTA. FFR CT was computed from 3-dimensional CT model and coronary flow dynamics data. Multiple FFR CT values were co-registered with measured FFR across the lesions, and trans-lesional delta were compared between FFR CT and FFR. The mean values of the most distal FFR and FFR CT in the same co-registered regions were 0.72 ± 0.10 and 0.69 ± 0.11, respectively. In 13 vessels (72.2%), FFR was ≤0.80, while in 14 vessels (77.8%), FFR CT was ≤0.80. Trans-lesional delta FFR and FFR CT were 0.10 ± 0.09 and 0.09 ± 0.10 in distal segments, while 0.17 ± 0.10 and 0.22 ± 0.13 in proximal segments, respectively. The coefficient of correlation between trans-lesional delta FFR and FFR CT in each segment was 0.92 ( p