Robotic approach using simple and radical hysterectomy for endometrial cancer with long-term follow-up evaluation
Background Feasibility and outcome of robotic‐assisted laparoscopy (RAL) for endometrial cancer was evaluated with a mean follow‐up of 4 years. Methods Robotic hysterectomy (RH) and type B robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH), with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLH), was performed on 51 consecuti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery 2016-03, Vol.12 (1), p.109-113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Feasibility and outcome of robotic‐assisted laparoscopy (RAL) for endometrial cancer was evaluated with a mean follow‐up of 4 years.
Methods
Robotic hysterectomy (RH) and type B robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH), with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLH), was performed on 51 consecutive patients. Records were reviewed for demographic data, medical/surgical history and comorbidities, perioperative findings and outcomes, as well as long‐term complications and recurrences. Regarding stage, according to 2009 FIGO, 25% of cases were IA, while 20%, 53% and 2% of cases were, respectively, IB, II and IIIA stage.
Results
Twenty‐eight patients underwent RRH + PLH (54.9%), four patients underwent RH with concurrent nodal sampling (NS) (7.8%); a total of 32 PLH were performed (62.6%).The median operative time for RRH + PLH was 255 min (range: 160–435). Pathology confirmed the adequacy of the surgical specimen.
Conclusion
Our data support the adoption of RAL staging in patients with endometrial cancer, including those with cervical involvement, and demonstrate good long‐term outcomes. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1478-5951 1478-596X |
DOI: | 10.1002/rcs.1647 |