Optimal emission enhancement in orthogonal double-pulse laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
Orthogonal double-pulse (DP) laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) was performed using reheating and pre-ablative configurations. The ablation pulse power density was varied by two orders of magnitude and the DP experiments were carried out for a wide range of interpulse delays. For both DP-LI...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Spectrochimica acta. Part B: Atomic spectroscopy 2015-08, Vol.110, p.139-145 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Orthogonal double-pulse (DP) laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) was performed using reheating and pre-ablative configurations. The ablation pulse power density was varied by two orders of magnitude and the DP experiments were carried out for a wide range of interpulse delays. For both DP-LIBS schemes, the signal enhancement was evaluated with respect to the corresponding single-pulse (SP) LIBS as a function of the interpulse delay. The reheating scheme shows a sharp maximum signal enhancement of up to 200-fold for low ablative power densities (0.4GW cm−2); however, for power densities larger than 10GW cm−2 this configuration did not improve the SP outcome. On the other hand, a more uniform signal enhancement of about 4–6 was obtained for the pre-ablative scheme nearly independently of the used ablative power density. In terms of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) the pre-ablative scheme shows a monotonic increment with the ablative power density. Whereas the reheating configuration reaches a maximum at 2.2 GW cm−2, its enhancement effect collapses markedly for fluencies above 10 GW cm−2.
•Comparison of reheating and pre-ablative double-pulse LIBS was done using a wide range of ablation power densities.•Experimental parameters that could achieve optimal signal-to-noise ratio were investigated.•A reheating scheme is better for low-ablation power densities.•A pre-ablative configuration is better for high-ablation power densities. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0584-8547 1873-3565 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.sab.2015.06.012 |