Quantitative Sex Differences in Response to the Dissolution of a Romantic Relationship
We gathered data that would allow us to examine evolutionarily informed predictions regarding emotional and physical responses to a breakup-a cluster of correlated responses we refer to as postrelationship grief (PRG). We tested predictions of the existing biological model of human mating and looked...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evolutionary behavioral sciences 2015-10, Vol.9 (4), p.270-282 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We gathered data that would allow us to examine evolutionarily informed predictions regarding emotional and physical responses to a breakup-a cluster of correlated responses we refer to as postrelationship grief (PRG). We tested predictions of the existing biological model of human mating and looked to replicate or expand on the extant literature by surveying 5,705 participants in 96 countries (Mage ≈ 27 years). Seventy-five percent of respondents experienced a breakup and 75% of those individuals experienced multiple breakups. Most responses differed significantly by sex. Emotional response was more severe than physical, with women expressing higher levels than men in each instance. Distribution of responses was similar between sexes. Intensity of emotional response for both sexes was notable: median (and mean) response of nearly 7 (of 10). Component responses, both physical and emotional, again showed significant variation but similar distributions. Women initiated breakups more frequently. Rejected individuals experienced higher PRG levels than those initiating the breakup or breakups via mutual agreement; however, the PRG experience was still relatively severe for both parties. "Lack of communication," was the most prevalent breakup cause. This initial investigation suggests that PRG requires continued study. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2330-2925 2330-2933 |
DOI: | 10.1037/ebs0000054 |