Normothermic machine perfusion reduces bile duct injury and improves biliary epithelial function in rat donor livers

Bile duct injury may occur during liver procurement and transplantation, especially in livers from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has been shown to reduce hepatic injury compared to static cold storage (SCS). However, it is unknown whether NMP pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Liver transplantation 2016-07, Vol.22 (7), p.994-1005
Hauptverfasser: op den Dries, Sanna, Karimian, Negin, Westerkamp, Andrie C., Sutton, Michael E., Kuipers, Michiel, Wiersema‐Buist, Janneke, Ottens, Petra J., Kuipers, Jeroen, Giepmans, Ben N., Leuvenink, Henri G. D., Lisman, Ton, Porte, Robert J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Bile duct injury may occur during liver procurement and transplantation, especially in livers from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has been shown to reduce hepatic injury compared to static cold storage (SCS). However, it is unknown whether NMP provides better preservation of bile ducts. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of NMP on bile duct preservation in both DCD and non‐DCD livers. DCD and non‐DCD livers obtained from Lewis rats were preserved for 3 hours using either SCS or NMP, followed by 2 hours ex vivo reperfusion. Biomarkers of bile duct injury (gamma‐glutamyltransferase and lactate dehydrogenase in bile) were lower in NMP‐preserved livers compared to SCS‐preserved livers. Biliary bicarbonate concentration, reflecting biliary epithelial function, was 2‐fold higher in NMP‐preserved livers (P < 0.01). In parallel with this, the pH of the bile was significantly higher in NMP‐preserved livers (7.63 ± 0.02 and 7.74 ± 0.05 for non‐DCD and DCD livers, respectively) compared with SCS‐preserved livers (7.46 ± 0.02 and 7.49 ± 0.04 for non‐DCD and DCD livers, respectively). Scanning and transmission electron microscopy of donor extrahepatic bile ducts demonstrated significantly decreased injury of the biliary epithelium of NMP‐preserved donor livers (including the loss of lateral interdigitations and mitochondrial injury). Differences between NMP and SCS were most prominent in DCD livers. Compared to conventional SCS, NMP provides superior preservation of bile duct epithelial cell function and morphology, especially in DCD donor livers. By reducing biliary injury, NMP could have an important impact on the utilization of DCD livers and outcome after transplantation. Liver Transplantation 22 994–1005 2016 AASLD
ISSN:1527-6465
1527-6473
DOI:10.1002/lt.24436