Treatment of Distal Anterior Circulation Aneurysms With the Pipeline Embolization Device: A US Multicenter Experience

BACKGROUND:Utilization of the Pipeline embolization device (PED) to treat distal carotid circulation aneurysms has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE:To report the collective experience of using PED to treat distal anterior circulation aneurysms. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiog...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurosurgery 2016-07, Vol.79 (1), p.14-22
Hauptverfasser: Lin, Ning, Lanzino, Giuseppe, Lopes, Demetrius K, Arthur, Adam S, Ogilvy, Christopher S, Ecker, Robert D, Dumont, Travis M, Turner, Raymond D, Gooch, M Reid, Boulos, Alan S, Kan, Peter, Snyder, Kenneth V, Levy, Elad I, Siddiqui, Adnan H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND:Utilization of the Pipeline embolization device (PED) to treat distal carotid circulation aneurysms has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE:To report the collective experience of using PED to treat distal anterior circulation aneurysms. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiographic records of all patients who underwent Pipeline embolization of distal anterior circulation aneurysms at 10 US neurosurgical centers between 2011 and 2013. RESULTS:Twenty-eight patients (mean age 51.7 years; 18 women) with 28 aneurysms were included in the analyses. Fifteen aneurysms were fusiform, 5 dissecting, and 8 saccular. Average aneurysm size was 12.3 mm; 7 were giant. Twenty aneurysms were located along the middle cerebral artery, 6 along the anterior cerebral artery, and 2 along the anterior communicating artery. PED deployment was successful in 27 patients, with coils utilized in 6 cases. Clinical follow-up was available for an average of 10.7 months (range 3-26). Twenty-seven patients had follow-up neurovascular imaging21 aneurysms had complete occlusion, 4 had residual neck filling, and 2 had residual dome filling. Periprocedural complications (
ISSN:0148-396X
1524-4040
DOI:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001117